Geometric-progression-free sets over quadratic number fields

被引:1
作者
Best, Andrew [1 ,6 ]
Huan, Karen [1 ]
McNew, Nathan [2 ,7 ]
Miller, Steven J. [1 ]
Powell, Jasmine [3 ,8 ]
Tor, Kimsy [4 ,9 ]
Weinstein, Madeleine [5 ]
机构
[1] Williams Coll, Dept Math & Stat, Williamstown, MA 01267 USA
[2] Dartmouth Coll, Dept Math, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Math, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[4] Manhattan Coll, Dept Math, Bronx, NY 10471 USA
[5] Harvey Mudd Coll, Dept Math, Claremont, CA 91711 USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Dept Math, 231 W 18th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[7] Towson Univ, Dept Math, Towson, MD 21252 USA
[8] Univ Michigan, Dept Math, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
[9] Univ Paris 06, Dept Math, F-75005 Paris, France
关键词
geometric-progression-free sets; Ramsey theory; quadratic number fields;
D O I
10.1017/S030821051600010X
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
In Ramsey theory one wishes to know how large a collection of objects can be while avoiding a particular substructure. A problem of recent interest has been to study how large subsets of the natural numbers can be while avoiding three-term geometric progressions. Building on recent progress on this problem, we consider the analogous problem over quadratic number fields. We first construct high-density subsets of the algebraic integers of an imaginary quadratic number field that avoid three-term geometric progressions. When unique factorization fails, or over a real quadratic number field, we instead look at subsets of ideals of the ring of integers. Our approach here is to construct sets `greedily', a generalization of the greedy set of rational integers considered by Rankin. We then describe the densities of these sets in terms of values of the Dedekind zeta function. Next, we consider geometric-progression-free sets with large upper density. We generalize an argument by Riddell to obtain upper bounds for the upper density of geometric-progression-free subsets, and construct sets avoiding geometric progressions with high upper density to obtain lower bounds for the supremum of the upper density of all such subsets. Both arguments depend critically on the elements with small norm in the ring of integers.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 262
页数:18
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Multiplicative structures in additively large sets [J].
Beiglbock, Mathias ;
Bergelson, Vitaly ;
Hindman, Neil ;
Strauss, Dona .
JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL THEORY SERIES A, 2006, 113 (07) :1219-1242
[2]   On sequences without geometric progressions [J].
Brown, BE ;
Gordon, DM .
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 1996, 65 (216) :1749-1754
[3]  
Hardy G. H., 1999, RAMANUJAN 12 LECT SU, P67
[4]  
MARCUS DANIEL A, 1977, NUMBER FIELDS
[5]   ON SETS OF INTEGERS WHICH CONTAIN NO THREE TERMS IN GEOMETRIC PROGRESSION [J].
McNew, Nathan .
MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION, 2015, 84 (296) :2893-2910
[6]   Counting integral ideals in a number field [J].
Murty, M. Ram ;
Van Order, Jeanine .
EXPOSITIONES MATHEMATICAE, 2007, 25 (01) :53-66
[7]  
Nathanson M. B., 2013, INTEGERS, V13, P1
[8]  
Nathanson M. B., 2014, ARXIV14082880
[9]  
OEIS Foundation Inc, ON LINE ENCY INTEGER
[10]  
RANKIN RA, 1960, P ROY SOC EDINB A, V65, P332