Patient and public involvement: models and muddles

被引:58
作者
Forbat, Liz [1 ]
Hubbard, Gill [1 ]
Kearney, Nora [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stirling, Canc Care Res Ctr, Stirling FK9 4LA, Scotland
关键词
nurses; nursing; patient participation; policy; qualitative study; research in practice; DECISION-MAKING; PARTICIPATION; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02519.x
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectives. This paper explores the range of models of involvement which are drawn upon in an empirical study and which are invoked in the literature and policy. The results and discussion of the study help to excavate and explore the muddle of conceptualisations of involvement and how this leads to difficulties for practitioners, patients and managers in implementing the relevant policy. Background. Patient and public involvement has developed an important profile internationally within health and social care policy. However, its importance as a rhetorical device has not been accompanied by adequate developments in how it is operationalised. Design. Cross-sectional study, with an intervention conducted at three sites, and non-intervention measures taken at two control sites. Methods. This paper draws on an empirical study of involvement. Focus groups were conducted with a lung cancer team and people affected by cancer at five health boards across Scotland. Chief executives of each of these five health boards also took part in individual interviews. Participants were asked to describe their ideas of what involvement is and their application of it. Results. A range of ways of conceptualising involvement were apparent. Few of these moved beyond the use of patient satisfaction questionnaires. At times, troubling understandings were articulated, for example, using public meetings to communicate decisions about service closures to the public. Conclusion. The slow escalation of involvement is in part because of the myriad ways in which it is conceptualised and discussed. Thus, we conclude that one of the greatest barriers to truly integrating patient involvement into health services, policy and research is the conceptual muddle with which involvement is articulated, understood and actioned. Relevance to clinical practice. Clinicians need to be supported to seek clarity in the use and operationalisation of involvement if the agenda is to be truly adopted and strengthened.
引用
收藏
页码:2547 / 2554
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Public and Patient Involvement at the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence
    Barham, Leela
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2011, 4 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [42] Patient and public involvement in health research: Ethical imperative and/or radical challenge?
    Rose, Diana
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 19 (01) : 149 - 158
  • [43] Attitudes and approaches to patient and public involvement across Europe: A systematic review
    Biddle, Michele S. Y.
    Gibson, Andy
    Evans, David
    HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 2021, 29 (01) : 18 - 27
  • [44] Patient and public involvement in the design of clinical trials: An overview of systematic reviews
    Price, Amy
    Albarqouni, Loai
    Kirkpatrick, Jo
    Clarke, Mike
    Liew, Su May
    Roberts, Nia
    Burls, Amanda
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (01) : 240 - 253
  • [45] Patient and Public Involvement in Occupational Therapy Health Research: A Scoping Review
    Rossvoll, Toril Beate
    Hanssen, Tove Aminda
    Rosenvinge, Jan H.
    Liabo, Kristin
    Pettersen, Gunn
    OTJR-OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 2023, 43 (01): : 119 - 126
  • [46] Patient and public involvement in an international rheumatology translational research project: an evaluation
    de Souza, Savia
    Johansson, Eva C.
    Karlfeldt, Susanne
    Raza, Karim
    Williams, Ruth
    BMC RHEUMATOLOGY, 2022, 6 (01)
  • [47] Patient and public involvement in the development of clinical practice guidelines: a scoping review
    Bryant, Elizabeth Ann
    Scott, Anna Mae
    Greenwood, Hannah
    Thomas, Rae
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [48] Patient Preference and Satisfaction with Their Involvement in the Selection of an Anesthetic Method for Surgery
    Hwang, Sung Mi
    Lee, Jae Jun
    Jang, Ji Su
    Gim, Gi Ho
    Kim, Min Chul
    Lim, So Young
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 29 (02) : 287 - 291
  • [49] Patient and public involvement in clinical guidelines: international experiences and future perspectives
    Boivin, Antoine
    Currie, Kay
    Fervers, Beatrice
    Gracia, Javier
    James, Marian
    Marshall, Catherine
    Sakala, Carol
    Sanger, Sylvia
    Strid, Judi
    Thomas, Victoria
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Grol, Richard
    Burgers, Jako
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (05):
  • [50] Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters
    Fredriksson, Mio
    Tritter, Jonathan Q.
    SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2017, 39 (01) : 95 - 111