Reading between the lines: The effect of contextual factors on student motivation throughout an open inquiry process

被引:19
作者
Adler, Idit [1 ]
Schwartz, Liron [1 ]
Madjar, Nir [1 ]
Zion, Michal [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Sch Educ, IL-5290002 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
inquiry; motivation; online learning; self-determination theory; SELF-DETERMINATION; GUIDED INQUIRY; ACHIEVEMENT GOALS; SCIENCE; AUTONOMY; SUPPORT; SCHOOL; METACOGNITION; INSTRUCTION; COMPETENCE;
D O I
10.1002/sce.21445
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Inquiry provides opportunities to engage students in authentic science. Although inquiry's underlying principles can motivate students to learn, the challenges that students encounter may hamper their motivation. Thus, the teacher's role in providing motivational support is crucial. This research examines how the interplay among the inquiry's characteristics, the challenges encountered by students, and the motivational support provided by the teacher affects students' expression of motivation throughout an online inquiry process. The messages of both the teacher and the students were examined using self-determination theory (SDT). The results indicate that the students did not automatically embrace the autonomous characteristic of open inquiry. Their expressions of motivation were dynamic, affected by the challenges that they encountered. In contrast, the teacher maintained high levels of autonomy and competence and intertwined these components in a strategy that we term guided autonomy. The teacher and students expressed high-order expressions of affect. In addition, we found a positive correlation between the teacher's motivational support and the students' expressions of motivation. The results indicate that SDT can provide a powerful framework for understanding students' unfolding motivation throughout a challenging educational process and for guiding teachers' efforts in supporting the motivation of their students in an online environment.
引用
收藏
页码:820 / 855
页数:36
相关论文
共 124 条
[91]  
Rovai A. P., 2007, Internet and Higher Education, V10, P77, DOI 10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.001
[92]  
Ryan R.M., 2002, Handbook of Self-Determination Research, P3
[93]   Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions [J].
Ryan, RM ;
Deci, EL .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 25 (01) :54-67
[94]   The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting [J].
Sadeh, Irit ;
Zion, Michal .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2009, 46 (10) :1137-1160
[95]   Social interaction - What can it tell us about metacognition and coregulation in learning? [J].
Salonen, P ;
Vauras, M ;
Efklides, A .
EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 10 (03) :199-208
[96]   Urban Middle School Students' Perceptions of the Value and Difficulty of Inquiry [J].
Sandoval, William A. ;
Harven, Aletha M. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 20 (01) :95-109
[97]   Promoting general metacognitive awareness [J].
Schraw, G .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 1998, 26 (1-2) :113-125
[98]   Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich [J].
Schunk, DH .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2005, 40 (02) :85-94
[99]  
Schunk DH, 2002, ADOLESCENCE EDUC, P29
[100]  
Schwab J., 1962, TEACHING SCI, P3, DOI DOI 10.1080/00963402.1958.11453895