Pension Enhancements and the Retention of Public Employees

被引:16
作者
Koedel, Cory [1 ,2 ]
Xiang, P. Brett [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Dept Econ, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Truman Sch Publ Affairs, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
关键词
labor market institutions; labor and employment policies; labor supply elasticities; pay practices; economics; education; retirement; retention; TEACHER TURNOVER; SOCIAL-SECURITY; INCENTIVES; SCHOOLS; KNOWLEDGE; BENEFITS; QUALITY; SYSTEMS; MARKET;
D O I
10.1177/0019793916650452
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The authors use data from workers in the largest public-sector occupation in the United Statesteachingto examine the effect of pension enhancements on employee retention. Specifically, they study a 1999 enhancement to the benefit formula for public school teachers in St. Louis, Missouri, that resulted in an immediate and dramatic increase in their incentives to remain in covered employment. To identify the effect of the enhancement on teacher retention, the analysis leverages the fact that the strength of the incentive increase varied across the workforce depending on how far teachers were from retirement eligibility when it was enacted. The results indicate that the St. Louis enhancementwhich was structurally similar to enhancements that were enacted in other public pension plans across the United States in the late 1990s and early 2000swas not a cost-effective way to increase employee retention.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 551
页数:33
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[2]   An Options Pricing Method for Calculating the Market Price of Public Sector Pension Liabilities [J].
Biggs, Andrew G. .
PUBLIC BUDGETING AND FINANCE, 2011, 31 (03) :94-118
[3]   Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students [J].
Boyd, D ;
Lankford, H ;
Loeb, S ;
Wyckoff, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (02) :166-171
[4]   The Influence of School Administrators on Teacher Retention Decisions [J].
Boyd, Donald ;
Grossman, Pam ;
Ing, Marsha ;
Lankford, Hamilton ;
Loeb, Susanna ;
Wyckoff, James .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2011, 48 (02) :303-333
[5]  
Brown Jeffrey R., 2013, 19168 NBER
[6]   The link between pensions and retirement timing: Lessons from California teachers [J].
Brown, Kristine M. .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2013, 98 :1-14
[7]   When They're Sixty-Four: Peer Effects and the Timing of Retirement [J].
Brown, Kristine M. ;
Laschever, Ron A. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2012, 4 (03) :90-115
[8]   What you don't know can't help you: Pension knowledge and retirement decision-making [J].
Chan, Sewin ;
Stevens, Ann Huff .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2008, 90 (02) :253-266
[9]   Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood [J].
Chetty, Raj ;
Friedman, John N. ;
Rockoff, Jonah E. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 104 (09) :2633-2679
[10]   WHICH TEACHERS CHOOSE A DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PENSION PLAN? EVIDENCE FROM THE FLORIDA RETIREMENT SYSTEM [J].
Chingos, Matthew M. ;
West, Martin R. .
EDUCATION FINANCE AND POLICY, 2015, 10 (02) :193-222