Early pre-eclampsia:: What proportion of women qualify for expectant management and if not, why not?

被引:19
作者
Hall, David R.
Grove, Debbie
Carstens, Erna
机构
[1] Tygerberg Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
[2] Univ Stellenbosch, ZA-7505 Tygerberg, South Africa
关键词
expectant management; pre-eclampsia;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.01.003
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine what proportion of women with early pre-eclampsia qualify for expectant management and the magnitude of factors excluding this approach. Study design: A prospective case series with continuous data capture over one year at a tertiary referral centre. All women (n = 169) with singleton pregnancies, presenting with early ( >= 20 and < 34 weeks' gestation) pre-eclampsia, were admitted, stabilised and evaluated. Major maternal or fetal complications at this stage were indications for delivery. However, when the pregnancy was otherwise stable, expectant management was commenced if the gestation was >= 24 weeks. Termination was offered from 20 to 23 weeks' gestation. Results: Of the 169 women admitted, 82 (48.5%) were managed expectantly and 87 (51.5%) delivered after stabilisation and evaluation. Early fetal distress (32%) and major maternal complications (28%) were the most frequent reasons preventing expectant management. Ascites (18%) and HELLP syndrome (13%) ranked highest amongst the maternal complications. Conclusions: In this study, almost half of the women presenting with early onset pre-eclampsia qualified for expectant management. Early fetal distress was the most frequent reason preventing expectant management. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 174
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   MEDICAL PROGRESS - PRIMARY PREVENTION OF STROKE [J].
BRONNER, LL ;
KANTER, DS ;
MANSON, JE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (21) :1392-1400
[2]   CHARACTERIZATION OF ASCITES PRESENT AT CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
CALVIN, S ;
SILVA, M ;
WEINSTEIN, L ;
FINLEY, P ;
WITTE, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1991, 8 (02) :99-102
[3]  
CORNETTE J, 2003, P 22 C PRIOR PER CAR, P23
[4]   THE CLASSIFICATION AND DEFINITION OF THE HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS OF PREGNANCY [J].
DAVEY, DA ;
MACGILLIVRAY, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1988, 158 (04) :892-898
[5]  
*DEP HLTH, 2002, 2 DEP HLTH
[6]   Do women with pre-eclampsia, and their babies, benefit from magnesium sulphate? The Magpie Trial: a randomised placebo-controlled trial [J].
Duley, L ;
Farrell, B ;
Spark, P ;
Roberts, B ;
Watkins, K ;
Bricker, L ;
Wang, L ;
Armstrong, N ;
Tivnin, M ;
Salih, N ;
Hurst, A ;
Smyth, R ;
Cooper, S ;
Wilson, A ;
Bowler, U ;
Notman, J .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9321) :1877-1890
[7]   Post Magpie: how should we be managing severe preeclampsia? [J].
Frias, AE ;
Belfort, MA .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 15 (06) :489-495
[8]   Risk factors for adverse maternal outcomes among women with HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count) syndrome [J].
Haddad, B ;
Barton, JR ;
Livingston, JC ;
Chahine, R ;
Sibai, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 183 (02) :444-448
[9]  
Hall D R, 2002, J Obstet Gynaecol, V22, P636, DOI 10.1080/0144361021000020420
[10]   Expectant management of early onset, severe pre-eclampsia:: Perinatal outcome [J].
Hall, DR ;
Odendaal, HJ ;
Kirsten, GF ;
Smith, J ;
Grové, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (10) :1258-1264