The Optimization of a Virtual Dual Production-Inventory System under Dynamic Supply Disruption Risk

被引:6
|
作者
Chen, Yu [1 ]
Liu, Liyuan [2 ]
Shi, Victor [3 ]
Zhang, Yibin [1 ,4 ]
Zhu, Jing [5 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Lixin Univ Accounting & Finance, Sch Business Adm, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Univ Engn Sci, Sch Math Phys & Stat, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[3] Wilfrid Laurier Univ, Lazaridis Sch Business & Econ, Waterloo, ON N2L 3C5, Canada
[4] Univ Cambridge, Inst Mfg, Mfg & Management Div, Dept Engn, 17 Charles Babbage Rd, Cambridge CB3 0FS, England
[5] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Business Adm, Chengdu 611130, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CHAIN; DEMAND; MANAGEMENT; POLICIES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1155/2020/7067502
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Major events such as the COVID-19 pandemic, Olympic Games, and G20 Summit bring about supplier disruption risks and challenges to supply chain management. To help deal with these risks, a virtual dual-sourcing production-inventory system can be deployed. In this paper, we study such a system which consists of a raw material supplier, a manufacturer, and a virtual dual-sourcing contingency supplier. The manufacturer needs to determine the production, procurement, and inventory plan of raw materials. When its supplier is interrupted, the manufacturer may need to adjust the production and inventory plan and work with the contingency supplier. We develop a system dynamics method to simulate the operations in this production-inventory system to identify the approximately optimal order-up-to-level inventory policies. We find that the virtual dual production-inventory strategy can be the optimal contingency policy to deal with supplier dynamic disruption risks. Furthermore, for disruption risk with low frequency and long duration, the manufacturer should increase the safety inventory level before the disruption. Otherwise, it should increase the safety inventory level in every cycle.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-echelon production-inventory system with supply disruption
    Pal, Brojeswar
    Sana, Shib Sankar
    Chaudhuri, Kripasindhu
    JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS, 2014, 33 (02) : 262 - 276
  • [2] A disruption recovery model for a single stage production-inventory system
    Hishamuddin, H.
    Sarker, R. A.
    Essam, D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 222 (03) : 464 - 473
  • [3] Managing disruption in an imperfect production-inventory system
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Sarker, Ruhul
    Essam, Daryl
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 84 : 101 - 112
  • [4] Inventory strategy development under supply disruption risk
    Mokhtar, Samira
    Bahri, Parisa A.
    Shahnazari, Mahdi
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 161
  • [5] Sustainable production-inventory system for perishables under dynamic fuel pricing and preservation technology investment
    Rana, Ranveer Singh
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Prasad, Kanika
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (39) : 90121 - 90147
  • [6] Dynamic strategies for supply disruptions in production-inventory systems
    Li, Shanshan
    He, Yong
    Chen, Lujie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2017, 194 : 88 - 101
  • [7] Optimizing a single-product production-inventory system under constant absolute risk aversion
    Lin, Sen
    Li, Bo
    Arreola-Risa, Antonio
    Huang, Yiwei
    TOP, 2023, 31 (03) : 510 - 537
  • [8] A disruption recovery plan in a three-stage production-inventory system
    Paul, Sanjoy Kumar
    Sarker, Ruhul
    Essam, Daryl
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2015, 57 : 60 - 72
  • [9] A Markovian production-inventory system with consideration of random quality disruption
    Karim, Rubayet
    Nakade, Koichi
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MECHANICAL DESIGN SYSTEMS AND MANUFACTURING, 2020, 14 (05):
  • [10] Behavioral operations effect of fairness and unfairness concern in the decision of the supply chain production-inventory system
    Fu, Kaifang
    Chen, Zhixiang
    Sarker, Bhaba R.
    JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT, 2023, 18 (01) : 94 - 116