G-SECI model-based knowledge creation for CoPS innovation: the role of grey knowledge

被引:38
作者
Li, Min [1 ]
Liu, Huimin [1 ]
Zhou, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Management & Engn, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Knowledge creation; Grey knowledge; Complex product systems; G-SECI model; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; COMPLEX PRODUCTS; EMPIRICAL-TEST; MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY; PROJECT; ORGANIZATION; SYSTEMS; CONVERGENT;
D O I
10.1108/JKM-10-2016-0458
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper aims to propose a new knowledge creation model called Grey SECI (G-SECI), study the knowledge creation mechanism and the relationship between knowledge creation models and innovation performance during complex product systems (CoPSs) development. Research and development of CoPSs relies heavily on knowledge creation. However, most scholars have studied CoPS innovation stages from the view of design process of system products, focussing on functional management and project management during the R&D process for CoPS. Attention is lacking with regards to the key and essence of creating a complex technology: the creation of knowledge. Design/methodology/approach Modified from the classic SECI model's spiral process of knowledge creation, a grey-SECI (G-SECI) knowledge creation model is here proposed vis-a-vis three knowledge categories: explicit knowledge, grey knowledge and tacit knowledge. Then, this paper further analyzes the effects of knowledge creation from the perspective of individual and the view of organization. Besides, an empirical study is conducted. Findings Statistical analysis indicates that there are three main paths of knowledge creation: individual experience knowledge acquisition, individual communication and reflection and organizational knowledge learning. Results further suggest that knowledge internalization by practice (KIP) is the key mode of knowledge creation, as well as the most important step for high-quality CoPS performance. Moreover, individual innovation performance is influenced by knowledge internalization by reflection and KIP; and organization innovation performance is influenced by knowledge combination and knowledge systematization. Research limitations/implications The coverage of geographical distribution is limited. Therefore, there are no data from foreign enterprises. The impact of different geographical cultures on CoPS knowledge creation model could be further investigated; in addition, the statistical analysis results of this study need to be further verified in other industries. Practical implications This paper provides a series of insights for CoPS project leaders. The results may also provide practical guidance for the related management personnel in the fields of human resource training, project planning, project quality and technology R&D in CoPS R&D management. Originality/value The paper's main contribution is to modify classic SECI knowledge conversion model by introducing grey knowledge and build a new G-SECI knowledge creation model. Besides, the paper adds empirical evidence on the knowledge creation paths in CoPS and reveals that internalization by practice is the key mode of knowledge creation.
引用
收藏
页码:887 / 911
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A dynamic model for measuring knowledge level of organizations based on Nonaka and Takeuchi Model (SECI)
    Nezafati, Navid
    Afrazeh, Abbas
    Jalali, S. Mohammad J.
    SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS, 2009, 4 (05): : 535 - 546
  • [22] Alliance-Based Model of Knowledge Creation and Innovation: The Case of EI-Log Development
    Ai, Shizhong
    Du, Rong
    2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-15, 2007, : 5540 - +
  • [23] Farmer field schools and the co-creation of knowledge and innovation: the mediating role of social capital
    Charatsari, Chrysanthi
    Lioutas, Evagelos D.
    Koutsouris, Alex
    AGRICULTURE AND HUMAN VALUES, 2020, 37 (04) : 1139 - 1154
  • [24] Organizational search and business model innovation: the moderating role of knowledge inertia
    Yu, Bo
    Hao, Shengbin
    Wang, Yu
    JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2020, 24 (07) : 1705 - 1718
  • [25] Developing supply chain open innovation capability: The mediating role of the knowledge creation process, governance mechanism and technology as a driver
    Chiu, Mai-Lun
    Lin, Chun-Nan
    JOURNAL OF INNOVATION & KNOWLEDGE, 2022, 7 (04):
  • [26] Quality Management and Environmental Management: Role of Knowledge Transfer and Organizational Innovation in Knowledge-Based Firms
    Joyami, Ehsan Namdar
    Yaghoubi, Nour Mohammad
    Rowshan, Seyed AliGholi
    JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (02) : 8457 - 8494
  • [27] Knowledge management in offshoring innovation by SMEs: role of internal knowledge creation capability, absorptive capacity and formal knowledge-sharing routines
    Khraishi, Ahmad
    Paulraj, Antony
    Huq, Fahian
    Seepana, Chandrasekararao
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2023, 28 (02) : 405 - 422
  • [28] Knowledge-based new product development: Fostering innovation through knowledge co-creation
    Kohlbacher, Florian
    International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 2008, 4 (03) : 326 - 346
  • [29] Studies on the mechanism of service innovation in the network alliance based on the knowledge creation
    Ren Li-Cheng
    Wu Cui-Hua
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2007 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (14TH) VOLS 1-3, 2007, : 1454 - +
  • [30] KNOWLEDGE CREATION AND TRANSFER USING THE SECI MODEL AND LMX THEORY: A TEACHER-STUDENT EXCHANGE (TSE) PERSPECTIVE
    Ibidunni, Ayodotun Stephen
    Ibidunni, Oyebisi Mary
    Olokundun, Maxwell Ayodele
    Akinbola, Olufemi Amos
    ADVED 2017: 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN EDUCATION AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, : 1060 - 1066