Building code enforcement burdens and central city decline

被引:28
作者
Burby, RJ [1 ]
May, PJ
Malizia, EE
Levine, J
机构
[1] Univ New Orleans, New Orleans, LA 70148 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01944360008976095
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Since the enactment: of Hammurabi's Code in ancient Babylon, building regulations have been relied upon to protect the public from the hazards of substandard building materials and slipshod construction techniques. Unnecessary building code requirements and strict enforcement practices, however, have been widely criticized for increasing the costs of new construction and rehabilitation, particularly within central cities. These burdens reduce the ability of central cities to compete successfully with surrounding suburban areas for population and economic development. In this article, we address the linkage between enforcement of building codes and construction activity. We show that central cities can capture a larger share of the marker for single-family detached housing in their metropolitan areas and also spur commercial rehabilitation if they adopt more "business-friendly" approaches to building code enforcement. These gains can be achieved without reducing the degree of compliance with building regulations as long as enforcement efforts are strong, in short, one key to increasing economic development in central cities is to foster the right kind of enforcement, rather than having weak enforcement of building regulations.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 161
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Flight from blight and metropolitan suburbanization revisited
    Adams, CF
    Fleeter, HB
    Kim, Y
    Freeman, M
    Cho, I
    [J]. URBAN AFFAIRS REVIEW, 1996, 31 (04) : 529 - 543
  • [2] *ADV COMM REG BARR, 1991, NOT MY BACKY REM BAR
  • [3] Alonso, 2013, LOCATION LAND USE
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1994, New visions for metropolitan America
  • [5] [Anonymous], HARV BUS REV MAY
  • [6] [Anonymous], METROPOLITAN DISPARI
  • [7] BAHL R, 1994, CITYSCAPE, V1, P293
  • [8] Bardach Eugene., 1982, GOING BOOK PROBLEM R
  • [9] BARNETT J, 1995, ARCHITECTURE APR, P55
  • [10] Bartik, 1991, WHO BENEFITS STATE L