Living with drought in South Africa: lessons learnt from the recent El Nino drought period

被引:145
作者
Baudoin, Marie-Ange [1 ]
Vogel, Coleen [2 ,3 ]
Nortje, Kirsty [1 ]
Naik, Myra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cape Town Upper Campus Geol Sci, ACDI, Bldg Level 613 Lib Rd, ZA-7700 Rondebosch, South Africa
[2] Univ Witwatersrand, Global Change & Sustainabil Inst, 1 Jan Smuts Ave, Johannesburg, South Africa
[3] Univ Witwatersrand, Sch Anim Plant & Environm Sci, 1 Jan Smuts Ave, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
Drought; Disaster risk management; South Africa; El Nino; Risk governance; CLIMATE; 20TH-CENTURY; VARIABILITY; ADAPTATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.05.005
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
South Africa is prone to drought. The country recently experienced the combined effects of a severe drought and a strong El Nino event, which led to serious impacts on livelihood conditions and economic growth. By examining the State's response to drought over time, with a specific focus on responses to the current 2016 El Nino -related drought, we expose a number of 'sticking points' in the response to drought and the delayed action to reduce the risks to drought impacts. Complex and seemingly bureaucratic hurdles limiting action are shown to be cumbersome factors that impede and continue to frustrate effective drought response in the country. Such bureaucratic inability to enable swift and flexible responses resulted in many NGOs and civic actors stepping up to provide assistance. As demonstrated in this research, while there are response plans and key contact departments and strategies in South Africa, these have become mired down in officialdom. Some suggest the blame lies with the State itself, and its alleged poor drought risk governance that affect recovery after drought, especially in the agricultural sector. Ineffective responses are surprising given that drought is a familiar feature and given there have been several previous cases of successes in institutional response in the past.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 137
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Abrams L, 1992, ROOT CAUSE RELIEF RE
[2]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[3]  
Agrawal A., 2008, ROLE LOCAL I AD CLIM
[4]  
AgriSA, 2016, RAINDR DROUGHT REP M
[5]   Climate adaptation: Institutional response to environmental constraints, and the need for increased flexibility, participation, and integration of approaches [J].
Amaru, Stephanie ;
Chhetri, Netra B. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 39 :128-139
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CLIMATE SOC
[7]  
[Anonymous], GEOPHYS RES LETT
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1986, How Institutions Think
[9]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN DEV REPORT 200
[10]  
[Anonymous], SPEC REP MAN RISKS E