A randomized trial to evaluate the use of text messaging, letter, and telephone call reminders to improve return of blood donors with reactive serologic tests

被引:9
作者
Porto-Ferreira, Francisco Augusto [1 ]
de Almeida-Neto, Cesar [1 ,2 ]
Murphy, Edward L. [3 ,4 ]
Montebello, Sandra de Camargo [1 ]
Hangai Nogueira, Fatima Aparecida [1 ]
Koga da Silva, Edina Mariko [5 ]
MacFarland, William [4 ]
Custer, Brian [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Prosangue Hemoctr Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Dept Med Sci, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[3] Blood Syst Res Inst, San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Dept Emergency Med Based Evidences, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
关键词
DONATION;
D O I
10.1111/trf.13882
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Low return rates for notification and counseling among donors with reactive serologic screening tests have been reported worldwide. A randomized trial to test the effectiveness of text message, letter, or telephone call reminders to improve return among nonresponding first- time blood donors with reactive serologic tests was conducted. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Donors with serologically reactive screening test results who had a cell phone and resided in the metropolitan telephone area code of Sao Paulo in the period from August 2013 through July 2014 were eligible. A consecutive sample of first- time donors with reactive screening tests who had not responded to a standard letter requesting the donor return to the blood center were randomly assigned to receive a text, a new letter, or a telephone call requesting return for notification and counseling. Return rates were measured over the subsequent 30 days. RESULTS: The return rate after a phone call reminder was better than that for a text message (39.8% vs. 28.4%; odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05- 2.64) but not better than that for a letter (39.8% vs. 34.4%; OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.80- 1.99). Older age was a predictor of higher rate of return with each year increase in age associated with a 2% increase in the odds of return (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01- 1.04). CONCLUSION: In nonresponding serologic reactive donors, telephone call led to a higher return rate than text message. The results of this study suggest that use of text messages, while attractive for its simplicity, will not lead to increased donor notification success after serologically reactive marker results from blood donation in Brazil.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 107
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Agarwal N, 2014, BLOOD TRANSFUS-ITALY, V12, pS51, DOI [10.2450/2013.0100-12, 10.2450/2012.0100-12]
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, BLOOD SAF AV
  • [3] Biazzi R., 2013, PESQUISA MOSTRA AUME
  • [4] Car J, 2013, COCHRANE DB SYST REV
  • [5] Comparison of an SMS text messaging and phone reminder to improve attendance at a health promotion center: A randomized controlled trial
    Chen, Zhou-wen
    Fang, Li-zheng
    Chen, Li-ying
    Dai, Hong-lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY-SCIENCE B, 2008, 9 (01): : 34 - 38
  • [6] Text Messaging as a Tool for Behavior Change in Disease Prevention and Management
    Cole-Lewis, Heather
    Kershaw, Trace
    [J]. EPIDEMIOLOGIC REVIEWS, 2010, 32 (01) : 56 - 69
  • [7] Craide S., 2016, NUMERO LINHAS ATIVAS
  • [8] Freitas F., 2014, MARANHAO ESTADO COM
  • [9] The relative efficacy of telephone and email reminders to elicit blood donation
    Germain, M.
    Godin, G.
    [J]. VOX SANGUINIS, 2016, 110 (03) : 278 - 281
  • [10] The effects of a phone call prompt on subsequent blood donation among first-time donors
    Godin, Gaston
    Amireault, Steve
    Vezina-Im, Lydi-Anne
    Germain, Marc
    Delage, Gilles
    [J]. TRANSFUSION, 2011, 51 (12) : 2720 - 2726