The Daily Exchange of Social Support Between Coworkers: Implications for Momentary Work Engagement

被引:22
作者
Zeijen, Marijntje E. L. [1 ]
Petrou, Paraskevas [1 ]
Bakker, Arnold B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Dept Work & Org Psychol, Ctr Excellence Posit Org Psychol, Woudestein Campus,Mandeville Bldg T16-16A, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Work & Org Psychol, Johannesburg, South Africa
关键词
social exchange theory; prosocial behavior; social exchange; social support; work engagement; PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; MULTILEVEL; PERSONALITY; RECIPROCITY; CROSSOVER; BENEFITS; BEHAVIOR; BURNOUT; MODEL; WORKAHOLISM;
D O I
10.1037/ocp0000262
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We develop a dyadic model of social exchange at work and shed light on how employees exchange support on a daily basis. In addition, we investigate when providing support relates to the work engagement of the provider. We hypothesized that the provider repeats his or her supportive action within a day when the receiver also provides support or when the receiver is engaged. We also predicted that supporting a coworker relates positively with the provider's engagement and that this relationship is strengthened when the support is given to an engaged receiver. To test our hypotheses, we used experience sampling and investigated support provision and work engagement in dyads of coworkers during the morning and afternoon of 4 working days. Multilevel analyses based on 123 dyads (N = 418-692 data points) revealed that supporting a coworker relates positively to the supporter's engagement and that this relationship is stronger when the support is given to an engaged receiver. Furthermore, results showed that the provider is more likely to repeat his/her supportive action if the receiver also provides support. We did not find a moderation effect of the receiver's engagement on the link between support provision during the morning and support provision during the afternoon. Altogether. our study provides insight on what motivates employees to support their coworkers and when providing support is most engaging. Furthermore, we show that the behavioral assumption of social exchange theory (i.e.. reinvesting support in a receiver who reciprocates) exists within a daily work context.
引用
收藏
页码:439 / 449
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[21]   Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review [J].
Cropanzano, R ;
Mitchell, MS .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (06) :874-900
[22]   SOCIAL EXCHANGE THEORY: A CRITICAL REVIEW WITH THEORETICAL REMEDIES [J].
Cropanzano, Russell ;
Anthony, Erica L. ;
Daniels, Shanna R. ;
Hall, Alison V. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2017, 11 (01) :479-516
[23]   Job design, work engagement and innovative work behavior: A multi-level study on Karasek's learning hypothesis [J].
De Spiegelaere, Stan ;
Van Gyes, Guy ;
De Witte, Hans ;
Van Hootegem, Geert .
MANAGEMENT REVUE, 2015, 26 (02) :123-137
[24]   The job demands-resources model of burnout [J].
Demerouti, E ;
Bakker, AB ;
Nachreiner, F ;
Schaufeli, WB .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 86 (03) :499-512
[25]   Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement [J].
Eisenberger, R ;
Lynch, P ;
Aselage, J ;
Rohdieck, S .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2004, 30 (06) :787-799
[26]   SOCIAL-EXCHANGE THEORY [J].
EMERSON, RM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1976, 2 :335-362
[27]   GOOD NEWS! CAPITALIZING ON POSITIVE EVENTS IN AN INTERPERSONAL CONTEXT [J].
Gable, Shelly L. ;
Reis, Harry T. .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 42, 2010, 42 :195-257
[28]   Helping others or helping oneself? An episodic examination of the behavioral consequences of helping at work [J].
Gabriel, Allison S. ;
Koopman, Joel ;
Rosen, Christopher C. ;
Johnson, Russell E. .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 71 (01) :85-107
[29]   The role of time in theory and theory building [J].
George, JM ;
Jones, GR .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2000, 26 (04) :657-684
[30]   Daily supportive equity in close relationships [J].
Gleason, MEJ ;
Iida, M ;
Bolger, N ;
Shrout, PE .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 2003, 29 (08) :1036-1045