Is Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Consistent in Performance?

被引:7
作者
Choudhari, Nikhil S. [1 ]
Badakere, Swathi Vallabh [1 ]
Richhariya, Ashutosh [2 ]
Chittajallu, Sai Naga Sri Harsha [2 ]
Senthil, Sirisha [1 ]
Garudadri, Chandra Sekhar [1 ]
机构
[1] LV Prasad Eye Inst, VST Glaucoma Ctr, Dr Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, India
[2] LV Prasad Eye Inst, Engn Grp Srujana, Dr Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, Hyderabad, India
来源
TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY | 2018年 / 7卷 / 03期
关键词
glaucoma drainage device; Ahmed glaucoma valve; priming; flow characterization; 5-YEAR TREATMENT OUTCOMES; IN-VITRO; INTRAOCULAR-PRESSURE; DRAINAGE IMPLANTS; CLOSING PRESSURE; BAERVELDT; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1167/tvst.7.3.19
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To investigate the mechanism of action and consistency in flow characteristics of the Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) under simulated physiological conditions in-vitro and to evaluate whether resistance during priming has any effect on performance of the device. Methods: Each newly opened AGV device was connected to a digital manometer and was primed with normal saline. The device was then placed in a saline bath and connected to an open manometer, a digital manometer, and an infusion pump. Saline was infused at a rate of 3 lL/min for 24 hours. Digital manometer readings were recorded at 4 Hz. Results: Data obtained from 9 devices are presented as medians (ranges). The priming pressure was 1130 (835, 1625) mm Hg. Pressure versus time curves showed two distinct phases; transient and steady phases. The transient phase peak pressure was 24 (13, 45) mm Hg. In the steady phase, opening and closing pressures were 13 (10, 17) and 7 (4, 9) mm Hg, respectively; the valve leaflets briefly opened every 73.9 (51, 76.6) minutes and the fluctuation of pressure (difference between opening and closing pressures) was 6 (3, 9) mm Hg. The Spearman correlation coefficient between priming and opening and priming and closing pressure was q = -0.13 (P = 0.72) and q = -0.36 (P = 0.33), respectively. Conclusions: The device showed functionality like a valve. The resistance during priming did not affect opening and closing pressures of the AGV. This study showed variable in vitro performance of the AGV.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AHM GLAUC VALV PROD
[2]   A clinical study of the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant in advanced glaucoma [J].
Ayyala, RS ;
Zurakowski, D ;
Smith, JA ;
Monshizadeh, R ;
Netland, PA ;
Richards, DW ;
Layden, WE .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (10) :1968-1976
[3]   Intraoperative testing of opening and closing pressure predicts risk of low intraocular pressure after Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation [J].
Bochmann, F. ;
Kipfer, A. ;
Tarantino, J. ;
Kaufmann, C. ;
Bachmann, L. ;
Thiel, M. .
EYE, 2014, 28 (10) :1184-1189
[4]   Five-Year Treatment Outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study [J].
Budenz, Donald L. ;
Barton, Keith ;
Gedde, Steven J. ;
Feuer, William J. ;
Schiffman, Joyce ;
Costa, Vital P. ;
Godfrey, David G. ;
Buys, Yvonne M. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 122 (02) :308-316
[5]   Priming the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve: Pressure Required and Effect of Overpriming [J].
Cheng, Jason ;
Abolhasani, Milad ;
Beltran-Agullo, Laura ;
Moss, Edward Bram ;
Buys, Yvonne M. ;
Trope, Graham E. .
JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2015, 24 (04) :E34-E35
[6]   Five-Year Pooled Data Analysis of the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study and the Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study [J].
Christakis, Panos G. ;
Zhang, Dongyu ;
Budenz, Donald L. ;
Barton, Keith ;
Tsai, James C. ;
Ahmed, Iqbal I. K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2017, 176 :118-126
[7]   The Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Study Five-Year Treatment Outcomes [J].
Christakis, Panos G. ;
Kalenak, Jeffrey W. ;
Tsai, James C. ;
Zurakowski, David ;
Kammer, Jeffrey A. ;
Harasymowycz, Paul J. ;
Mura, Juan J. ;
Cantor, Louis B. ;
Ahmed, Iqbal I. K. .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2016, 123 (10) :2093-2102
[8]  
Eisenberg DL, 1999, OPHTHALMIC SURG LAS, V30, P662
[9]   Characteristics of glaucoma drainage implants during dynamic and steady-state flow conditions [J].
Francis, BA ;
Cortes, A ;
Chen, J ;
Alvarado, JA .
OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 105 (09) :1708-1714
[10]  
Gautriaud, 2010, BIOPROCESS INT, V8, pS42