Social distancing as a public good under the COVID-19 pandemic

被引:58
作者
Cato, S. [1 ]
Iida, T. [1 ]
Ishida, K. [1 ]
Ito, A. [1 ]
McElwain, K. M. [1 ]
Shoji, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Social Sci, Bunkyo Ku, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Social distancing; Public good; Collective action problem; Altruism; Public shaming; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.puhe.2020.08.005
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study is to show that social distancing is a public good under the COVID-19 pandemic. Study design: We apply economic theory to analyse a cross-sectional survey. Methods: Economic theory is complemented with empirical evidence. An online survey of those aged 30-49 years in Japan (n = 2177) was conducted between April 28 and May 7. Respondents were selected by quota sampling with regard to age group, gender and prefecture of residence. Our main figure shows the proportion of people who increased/did not change/decreased social distancing, relative to the level of altruism and sensitivity to public shaming. The results of OLS and logit models are shown in Supplementary Materials. Results: Social distancing is a public good under the COVID-19 pandemic for which the free-rider problem is particularly severe. Altruism and social norms are crucial factors in overcoming this problem. Using an original survey, we show that people with higher altruistic concerns and sensitivity to shaming are more likely to follow social distancing measures. Conclusions: Altruism and social norms are important for reducing the economic cost of the pandemic. (C) 2020 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 53
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1965, LOGIC COLLECTIVE ACT
[2]  
Batson CD., 2011, ALTRUISM HUMANS, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195341065.001.0001
[3]   Incentives and prosocial behavior [J].
Benabou, Roland ;
Tirole, Jean .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (05) :1652-1678
[4]   Economic Incentives and Social Preferences: Substitutes or Complements? [J].
Bowles, Samuel ;
Polania-Reyes, Sandra .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2012, 50 (02) :368-425
[5]   A fine is a price [J].
Gneezy, U ;
Rustichini, A .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2000, 29 (01) :1-17
[6]  
Lin Z., 2020, W27099 NAT BUR EC RE
[7]   Collective action and the evolution of social norms [J].
Ostrom, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 14 (03) :137-158
[8]   THE PURE THEORY OF PUBLIC EXPENDITURE [J].
Samuelson, Paul A. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1954, 36 (04) :387-389