Effects of dry or wet conditions during the preweaning phase on subsequent feedlot performance and carcass composition of beef cattle

被引:0
|
作者
Gatson, Garth A. [1 ]
Gunn, Patrick J. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Busby, W. Darrell [3 ]
Wiegand, Bryon R. [1 ]
Vander Ley, Brian L.
Meyer, Allison M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Div Anim Sci, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[3] Tricty Steer Carcass Futur, Lewis, IA 51544 USA
[4] Great Plains Vet Educ Ctr, Clay Ctr, NE 68933 USA
[5] Purina Anim Nutr LLC, Greenfield, IN USA
关键词
beef cattle; carcass composition; drought; feedlot performance; precipitation; DAMS MILK-PRODUCTION; GROWTH; CONSEQUENCES; NUTRITION; CALF; MANAGEMENT; WEIGHT; YIELD;
D O I
10.1093/tas/txy095
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Our objective was to determine the effects of dry and wet conditions during the pre-weaning on subsequent feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of beef cattle. Steers (n = 7,432) and heifers (n = 2,361) finished in 16 feedlots in southwestern Iowa through the Tri-County Steer Carcass Futurity Cooperative were used for a retrospective analysis. Cattle originated in the Midwest (Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, Illinois, and Minnesota) and were born in February, March, or April of 2002 through 2013. Feedlot performance and carcass composition data were obtained for each animal. Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) values were obtained for each animal's preweaning environment on a monthly basis. Mean PDSI values were used to classify conditions as dry (<=-2.0), normal (>-2.0 and < 2.0), or wet (>= 2.0) for the cool (April and May), warm (June through August), and combined (April through August) forage growing seasons preweaning. Mixed models were used to evaluate the effects of PDSI class on subsequent performance. Calf sex, date of birth (as day of year), year, and feedlot were also included as fixed effects. When considering PDSI class during the cool season, cattle from normal and wet classes had a greater feedlot delivery BW (P <= 0.0001) than dry. Dry and normal classes had greater (P <= 0.02) delivery BW than wet during the warm and combined seasons, however. For the cool season, average daily gain was greater (P < 0.0001) for the dry class than normal and wet. Cattle from the normal class for the cool season had greater (P = 0.001) final BW than wet, but the wet class had the greatest (P < 0.04) and dry class had the lowest (P < 0.01) final BW during the warm season. During the cool season, HCW was greater (P < 0.007) for the normal than wet class, although HCW was greater (P <= 0.02) for wet compared with dry and normal during the warm season. Calculated yield grade was lower (P <= 0.006) for the normal class during the cool season compared with dry and wet. For both the warm and combined seasons, the dry class had lower (P <= 0.004) calculated yield grade compared with normal and wet. Carcasses from cattle that experienced normal or wet warm seasons had greater (P <= 0.0005) marbling scores than dry, and normal had greater (P = 0.0009) marbling score than dry for the combined seasons. In conclusion, these data indicate that both dry and wet conditions during the preweaning phase may impact ultimate feedlot performance and carcass composition.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 255
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WS Effects of dry and wet conditions during the pre-weaning phase on subsequent feedlot performance and carcass composition of beef cattle
    Gatson, G. A.
    Vander Ley, B. L.
    Busby, W. D.
    Gunn, P. J.
    Meyer, A. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 567 - 567
  • [2] Dry and wet conditions during the prepartum forage growing season affect offspring feedlot performance and carcass composition in beef cattle
    Meyer, A. M.
    Vander Ley, B. L.
    Gatson, G. A.
    Busby, W. D.
    Gunn, P. J.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 130 - 130
  • [3] Effects of winter growing programs on subsequent feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, body composition, and energy requirements of beef steers
    McCurdy, M. P.
    Horn, G. W.
    Wagner, J. J.
    Lancaster, P. A.
    Krehbiel, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (04) : 1564 - 1576
  • [4] FIXED EFFECTS IN THE FORMATION OF A COMPOSITE LINE OF BEEF-CATTLE .2. PREWEANING AND POSTWEANING GROWTH AND CARCASS COMPOSITION
    NEWMAN, S
    MACNEIL, MD
    REYNOLDS, WL
    KNAPP, BW
    URICK, JJ
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1993, 71 (08) : 2033 - 2039
  • [5] Integrating Genomics with Nutrition Models to Improve the Prediction of Cattle Performance and Carcass Composition under Feedlot Conditions
    Tedeschi, Luis O.
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (11):
  • [6] Effects of intake of monensin during the stocker phase and subsequent finishing phase on performance and carcass characteristics of finishing beef steers
    Weiss, C. P.
    Beck, P. A.
    Gadberry, M. S.
    Richeson, J. T.
    Wilson, B. K.
    Robinson, C. A.
    Zhao, J.
    Hess, T.
    Hubbell, D., III
    APPLIED ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2020, 36 (05): : 668 - 676
  • [7] Effects on performance and carcass composition of turning beef cattle out to pasture early in the spring
    Steen, RWJ
    GRASS AND FORAGE SCIENCE, 2002, 57 (04) : 401 - 404
  • [8] Effects of production system intensity on performance, carcass composition and meat quality of beef cattle
    Keane, MG
    Allen, P
    LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1998, 56 (03): : 203 - 214
  • [9] Effect of bovine respiratory disease during preconditioning on subsequent feedlot performance, carcass characteristics, and beef attributes
    Holland, B. P.
    Burciaga-Robles, L. O.
    VanOverbeke, D. L.
    Shook, J. N.
    Step, D. L.
    Richards, C. J.
    Krehbiel, C. R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2010, 88 (07) : 2486 - 2499
  • [10] Physical composition of carcass and meat characteristics of beef cattle finished in feedlot with different diets
    Roman, J.
    Jobim, C. C.
    Resende, F. D.
    Siqueira, G. R.
    Faria, M. H.
    Rivas, R.
    ARQUIVO BRASILEIRO DE MEDICINA VETERINARIA E ZOOTECNIA, 2010, 62 (06) : 1430 - 1438