Association Between the Opening of Retail Clinics and Low-Acuity Emergency Department Visits

被引:28
作者
Martsolf, Grant [1 ]
Fingar, Kathryn R. [4 ]
Coffey, Rosanna [4 ]
Kandrack, Ryan [1 ]
Charland, Tom [5 ]
Eibner, Christine [2 ]
Elixhauser, Anne [6 ]
Steiner, Claudia [6 ]
Mehrotra, Ateev [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] RAND Corp, Washington, DC USA
[3] RAND Corp, Boston, MA USA
[4] Truven Hlth Analyt, Santa Barbara, CA USA
[5] Merchant Med, St Paul, MN USA
[6] Agcy Healthcare Res & Qual, Rockville, MD USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Hlth Care Policy, Boston, MA USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
CARE; COST; SCOPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.08.462
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: We assess whether the opening of retail clinics near emergency departments (ED) is associated with decreased ED utilization for low-acuity conditions. Methods: We used data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Emergency Department Databases for 2,053 EDs in 23 states from 2007 to 2012. We used Poisson regression models to examine the association between retail clinic penetration and the rate of ED visits for 11 low-acuity conditions. Retail clinic "penetration" was measured as the percentage of the ED catchment area that overlapped with the 10-minute drive radius of a retail clinic. Rate ratios were calculated fora 10-percentage point increase in retail clinic penetration per quarter. During the course of a year, this represents the effect of an increase in retail clinic penetration rate from 0% to 40%, which was approximately the average penetration rate observed in 2012. Results: Among all patients, retail clinic penetration was not associated with a reduced rate of low-acuity ED visits (rate ratio=0.999; 95% confidence interval=0.997 to 1.000). Among patients with private insurance, there was a slight decrease in low-acuity ED visits (rate ratio=0.997; 95% confidence interval=0.994 to 0.999). For the average ED in a given quarter, this would equal a 0.3% reduction (95% confidence interval 0.1% to 0.6%) in low-acuity ED visits among the privately insured if retail clinic penetration rate increased by 10 percentage points per quarter. Conclusion: With increased patient demand resulting from the expansion of health insurance coverage, retail clinics may emerge as an important care location, but to date, they have not been associated with a meaningful reduction in low-acuity ED visits.
引用
收藏
页码:397 / 403
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Retail Clinic Visits For Low-Acuity Conditions Increase Utilization And Spending [J].
Ashwood, J. Scott ;
Gaynor, Martin ;
Setodji, Claude M. ;
Reid, Rachel O. ;
Weber, Ellerie ;
Mehrotra, Ateev .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2016, 35 (03) :449-455
[2]   Undertriage, overtriage, or no triage? In search of the unnecessary emergency department visit [J].
Asplin, BR .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2001, 38 (03) :282-285
[3]  
Bachrach D., 2015, BUILDING CULTURE HLT
[4]   The cost of an emergency department visit and its relationship to emergency department volume [J].
Bamezai, A ;
Melnick, G ;
Nawathe, A .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2005, 45 (05) :483-490
[5]   The rise if in-store clinics - Threat or opportunity? [J].
Bohmer, Richard .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (08) :765-768
[6]  
California HealthCare Foundation, 2006, OV EM DEP INS CAL
[7]   The use of hospital emergency departments for nonurgent health problems: A national perspective [J].
Cunningham, PJ ;
Clancy, CM ;
Cohen, JW ;
Wilets, M .
MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 1995, 52 (04) :453-474
[8]   Convenient care clinics: The future of accessible health care [J].
Hansen-Turton, Tine ;
Ryan, Sandra ;
Miller, Ken ;
Counts, Mona ;
Nash, David B. .
DISEASE MANAGEMENT, 2007, 10 (02) :61-73
[9]  
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, 2015, INTR HCUP NAT EM DEP
[10]  
Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), CENTR DISTR SEDD DES