Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study

被引:215
作者
Buckley, Lisa [1 ,2 ]
Kaye, Sherrie-Anne [3 ]
Pradhan, Anuj K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia Campus, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ Michigan, Transportat Res Inst, 2901 Baxter Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, CARRS Q, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
关键词
Automated vehicles; Theory of Planned Behavior; Technology Acceptance Model; Trust in automation; Driving simulator; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; PERCEIVED EASE; TRUST; ACCEPTANCE; WILLINGNESS; PERFORMANCE; EXPERIENCE; ATTITUDES; IMPACT; UTAUT;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.021
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
This study applied the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to assess drivers' intended use of automated vehicles (AVs) after undertaking a simulated driving task. In addition, this study explored the potential for trust to account for additional variance to the psychosocial factors in TPB and TAM. Seventy-four participants (51% female) aged between 25 and 64 years (M = 42.8, SD = 12.9) undertook a 20 min simulated experimental drive in which participants experienced periods of automated driving and manual control. A survey task followed. A hierarchical regression analysis revealed that TPB constructs; attitude toward the behavior, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, were significant predictors of intentions to use AV. In addition, there was partial support for the test of TAM, with ease of use (but not usefulness) predicting intended use of AV (SAE Level 3). Trust contributed variance to both models beyond TPB or TAM constructs. The findings provide an important insight into factors that might reflect intended use of vehicles that are primarily automated (longitudinal, lateral, and manoeuvre controls) but require and allow drivers to have periods of manual control.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR
    AJZEN, I
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) : 179 - 211
  • [2] Ajzen I., 2018, Constructing a theory of planned behaviour questionnaire
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, Taxonomy and Definitions For Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems For On-Road Motor Vehicles, DOI [DOI 10.4271/J3016_202104, 10.4271/J3016_202104]
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, National Conference of State Legislatures
  • [5] Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review
    Armitage, CJ
    Conner, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 40 : 471 - 499
  • [6] Beggiato Matthias, 2015, Information needs at different levels of automation, DOI [10.13140/RG.2.1.2462.6007, DOI 10.13140/RG.2.1.2462.6007]
  • [7] Automated Vehicles: Take-Over Request and System Prompt Evaluation
    Blanco, Myra
    Atwood, Jon
    Vasquez, Holland M.
    Trimble, Tammy E.
    Fitchett, Vikki L.
    Radlbeck, Joshua
    Fitch, Gregory M.
    Russell, Sheldon M.
    [J]. Road Vehicle Automation 3, 2016, : 111 - 119
  • [8] Applying the TAM to travelers' usage intentions of GPS devices
    Chen, Ching-Fu
    Chen, Pei-Chun
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (05) : 6217 - 6221
  • [9] Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
    Choi, Jong Kyu
    Ji, Yong Gu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2015, 31 (10) : 692 - 702