Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded to Provisional Crown Materials Utilizing Two Different Adhesives

被引:25
作者
Rambhia, Sameer [1 ]
Heshmati, Reza [2 ]
Dhuru, Virendra [1 ]
Iacopino, Anthony [3 ]
机构
[1] Marquette Univ, Sch Dent, Dept Gen Dent Sci, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Primary Care, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Manitoba, Fac Dent, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
关键词
Provisional crown materials; Shear bond strength; Orthodontic brackets; Adhesives; MODIFIED GLASS-IONOMER; FORCED ERUPTION; CERAMIC BRACKETS; DENTIN ADHESIVE; SYSTEMS; ENAMEL; CEMENT; TEETH;
D O I
10.2319/060908-298.1
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To test the hypothesis that there is no difference in the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to provisional crown materials (PCMs) using two adhesive agents. Materials and Methods: Four PCMs were tested: Integrity, Jet, Protemp, and Snap. Forty cylindrical specimens of 10 mm diameter x 5 mm were prepared for each PCM. Ten specimens from each group were bonded to one of the two brackets, Clarity or Victory, using one of the two adhesives, Fuji Ortho LC or Ortho Bracket Adhesive. The brackets were debonded in shear at a cross-head speed of 5 mm/min, and the shear bond strength (SBS) was calculated. The type of failure was visually determined. The numeric data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple range test at alpha = .05. Results: The mean SBSs ranged from 2.81 MPa to 9.65 MPa. There was a significant difference between Snap and the other three materials (P < .0001). There was no significant difference between the two brackets or the two adhesives (P > .05). The bond failure for all the specimens was of the adhesive type between the PCM and the adhesive resin. Conclusions: The PCM Snap yielded a significantly lower mean SBS value compared to the other three materials. No significant differences were found between the brackets or the adhesives. The bond failure was of the adhesive type. (Angle Orthod. 2009;79:784-789.)
引用
收藏
页码:784 / 789
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces [J].
Abu Alhaija, Elham S. J. ;
Al-Wahadni, Ahed M. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2007, 29 (04) :386-389
[2]  
Bishara SE, 2007, ANGLE ORTHOD, V77, P337, DOI 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0337:SBSCOT]2.0.CO
[3]  
2
[4]   A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF THE DEBONDING STRENGTHS OF DIFFERENT CERAMIC BRACKETS, ENAMEL CONDITIONERS, AND ADHESIVES [J].
BISHARA, SE ;
FEHR, DE ;
JAKOBSEN, JR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 1993, 104 (02) :170-179
[5]  
Carvalho CV, 2006, INT J PERIODONT REST, V26, P87
[6]  
Chappell R P, 1994, Quintessence Int, V25, P359
[7]  
CHAY SH, 2007, AM J ORTHOD DENTOFAC, V132
[8]  
Faltermeier A, 2007, ANGLE ORTHOD, V77, P494, DOI 10.2319/0003-3219(2007)077[0494:IOFLOT]2.0.CO
[9]  
2
[10]  
GRABER TM, 1985, ORTHODONTICS CURRENT, P138