3D Printed Parts with Honeycomb Internal Pattern by Fused Deposition Modelling; Experimental Characterization and Production Optimization

被引:47
作者
Moradi, Mahmoud [1 ]
Meiabadi, Saleh [2 ]
Kaplan, Alexander [3 ]
机构
[1] Malayer Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Malayer, Iran
[2] Ecole Technol Super Canada, Dept Mech Engn, Montreal, PQ H3C 1K3, Canada
[3] Lulea Univ Technol, Dept Engn Sci & Math, S-97187 Lulea, Sweden
关键词
3D printing; Fused deposition modelling; Mechanical properties; Part weight; Response surface method; PROCESS PARAMETERS; METHODOLOGY; FDM;
D O I
10.1007/s12540-019-00272-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the present study additive manufacturing of Polylactic acid by fused deposition modeling were investigated based on statistical analysis. The honeycomb internal pattern was employed to build inside of specimens due to its remarkable capability to resist mechanical loads. Simplify 3D was utilized to slice the 3D model and to adjust fixed parameters. Layer thickness, infill percentage, and extruder temperature were considered as controlled variables, while maximum failure load (N), elongation at break (mm), part weight (g), and build time (min) were selected as output responses and analysed by response surface method. Analysis of variance results identified layer thickness as the major controlled variable for all responses. Interaction of infill percentage and extruder temperature had a significant influence on elongation at break and therefore, tough fracture of printed parts. The input parameters were optimized to materialize tow criteria; the first one was to rise maximum failure load and the second was to attain tough fracture and lessen build time and part weight at a time. Optimal solutions were examined by experimental fabrication to evaluate the efficiency of the optimization method. There was a good agreement between empirical results and response surface method predictions which confirmed the reliability of predictive models. The optimal setting to fulfill the first criterion could bring on a specimen with more than 1500 (N) maximum failure load and less than 9 (g) weight.
引用
收藏
页码:1312 / 1325
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[2]   Mechanical properties, morphology, and hydrolytic degradation behavior of polylactic acid/natural rubber blends [J].
Buys, Y. F. ;
Aznan, A. N. A. ;
Anuar, H. .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN MANUFACTURING AND MATERIALS ENGINEERING (ICAMME 2017), 2018, 290
[3]   Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition modeling by Taguchi method for the fabrication of lattice structures [J].
Dong, Guoying ;
Wijaya, Grace ;
Tang, Yunlong ;
Zhao, Yaoyao Fiona .
ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING, 2018, 19 :62-72
[4]   Quantitative analysis of a chemical treatment to reduce roughness of parts fabricated using fused deposition modeling [J].
Galantucci, L. M. ;
Lavecchia, F. ;
Percoco, G. .
CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 59 (01) :247-250
[5]   Improving the fracture toughness of 3D printed thermoplastic polymers by fused deposition modeling [J].
Gardan, Julien ;
Makke, Ali ;
Recho, Naman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 2018, 210 (1-2) :1-15
[6]   Printing and characterisation of Kagome lattice structures by fused deposition modelling [J].
Gautam, Rinoj ;
Idapalapati, Sridhar ;
Feih, Stefanie .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2018, 137 :266-275
[7]  
Gibson I., 2016, Additive Manufacturing Technologies 3d Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, V2nd
[8]  
Groover MP., 2010, Fundamentals of modern manufacturing: materials processes, and systems
[9]  
Gupta A, 2014, INT J EMERG TECHNOL, V1, P62
[10]   Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: promises and challenges [J].
Ivanova, Olga ;
Williams, Christopher ;
Campbell, Thomas .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2013, 19 (05) :353-364