Sub-km scale numerical weather prediction model simulations of radiation fog

被引:37
作者
Smith, Daniel K. E. [1 ]
Renfrew, Ian A. [1 ]
Dorling, Stephen R. [1 ]
Price, Jeremy D. [2 ]
Boutle, Ian A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ East Anglia, Sch Environm Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Met Off, Exeter, Devon, England
关键词
boundary‐ layer; NWP; radiation fog; soil thermal conductivity; BOUNDARY-LAYER; MATERHORN-FOG; LIFE-CYCLE; IMPACT; VALLEY; JULES; ATMOSPHERE; SCHEME; CONFIGURATION; SENSITIVITY;
D O I
10.1002/qj.3943
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The numerical weather prediction (NWP) of fog remains a challenge, with accurate forecasts relying on the representation of many interacting physical processes. The recent Local And Non-local Fog EXperiment (LANFEX) has generated a detailed observational dataset, creating a unique opportunity to assess the NWP of fog events. We evaluate the performance of operational and research configurations of the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM) with three horizontal grid lengths, 1.5 km and 333 and 100 m, in simulating four LANFEX case studies. In general, the subkilometre (sub-km) scale versions of MetUM are in better agreement with the observations; however, there are a number of systematic model deficiencies. MetUM produces valleys that are too warm and hills that are too cold, leading to valleys that do not have enough fog and hills that have too much. A large sensitivity to soil temperature was identified from a set of parametrisation sensitivity experiments. In all the case studies, the model erroneously transfers heat too readily through the soil to the surface, preventing fog formation. Sensitivity tests show that the specification of the soil thermal conductivity parametrisation can lead to up to a 5-hr change in fog onset time. Overall, the sub-km models demonstrate promise, but they have a high sensitivity to surface properties.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 763
页数:18
相关论文
共 73 条
[41]   Key parameters for the life cycle of nocturnal radiation fog: a comprehensive large-eddy simulation study [J].
Maronga, B. ;
Bosveld, F. C. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 143 (707) :2463-2480
[42]   Representing model uncertainty in the Met Office convection-permitting ensemble prediction system and its impact on fog forecasting [J].
McCabe, Anne ;
Swinbank, Richard ;
Tennant, Warren ;
Lock, Adrian .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 142 (700) :2897-2910
[43]   Three-dimensional fog forecasting in complex terrain [J].
Mueller, M. D. ;
Masbou, M. ;
Bott, A. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2010, 136 (653) :2189-2202
[44]   The Meuse Valley fog of 1930: an air pollution disaster [J].
Nemery, B ;
Hoet, PHM ;
Nemmar, A .
LANCET, 2001, 357 (9257) :704-708
[45]   How important are aerosol-fog interactions for the successful modelling of nocturnal radiation fog? [J].
Poku, C. ;
Ross, A. N. ;
Blyth, A. M. ;
Hill, A. A. ;
Price, J. D. .
WEATHER, 2019, 74 (07) :237-243
[46]   Radiation Fog. Part II: Large-Eddy Simulations in Very Stable Conditions [J].
Porson, Aurore ;
Price, Jeremy ;
Lock, Adrian ;
Clark, Peter .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2011, 139 (02) :193-224
[47]   On the Formation and Development of Radiation Fog: An Observational Study [J].
Price, J. D. .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2019, 172 (02) :167-197
[48]   LANFEX: A Field and Modeling Study to Improve Our Understanding and Forecasting of Radiation Fog [J].
Price, J. D. ;
Lane, S. ;
Boutle, I. A. ;
Smith, D. K. E. ;
Bergot, T. ;
Lac, C. ;
Duconge, L. ;
McGregor, J. ;
Kerr-Munslow, A. ;
Pickering, M. ;
Clark, R. .
BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2018, 99 (10) :2061-2077
[49]   An Observational Case Study of Persistent Fog and Comparison with an Ensemble Forecast Model [J].
Price, Jeremy ;
Porson, Aurore ;
Lock, Adrian .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2015, 155 (02) :301-327
[50]   Radiation Fog. Part I: Observations of Stability and Drop Size Distributions [J].
Price, Jeremy .
BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY, 2011, 139 (02) :167-191