Comparison of classic constraint-induced movement therapy and its modified form on upper extremity motor functions and psychosocial impact in hemiplegic cerebral palsy

被引:4
|
作者
Afzal, Mamoona Tasleem [1 ]
Amjad, Imran [1 ]
Ghous, Misbah [1 ]
机构
[1] Riphah Int Univ, Riphah Coll Rehabil Sci, Islamabad, Pakistan
关键词
Constraint-induced movement therapy; Cerebral palsy; upper extremity; CHILDREN; RELIABILITY; EFFICACY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.47391/JPMA.1392
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A prospective randomised control trial (RCT) was palsy (HCP). Children between the ages of four and12 years with ipsilateral, bilateral or severely asymmetrical impairments who had wrist extension (20 degrees) and fingers flexion (10 degrees) were included. The outcomes tools, Box and of Life) and Kid screen were used at baseline, mid- and posttreatment assessment. Both the treatment approaches (CCIMT AND MCIMT) equally improved upper limb motor functions and psychosocial life of the children with HCP. On Quest tool, results of dissociated movement were significant (p=0.021) and on CPQOL tool two domains (participation & physical health and family health) showed significant difference (p=0.042, p=0.025). But no significant difference was noted regarding other domains of the tools. The study concluded that both the treatment approaches (CCIMT AND MCIMT) are effective in enhancing the upper limb motor functions and psychosocial life of children with HCP.
引用
收藏
页码:1418 / 1421
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Upper extremity constraint-induced movement therapy in infantile hemiplegia
    Ramachandran, Selvam
    Thakur, Preeti
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC NEUROSCIENCES, 2011, 6 (01) : 29 - 31
  • [22] Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy for children with cerebral palsy with asymmetric motor impairment
    Taub, E
    Ramey, SL
    DeLuca, S
    Echols, K
    PEDIATRICS, 2004, 113 (02) : 305 - 312
  • [23] Efficacy of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy and Bimanual Training in Children with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy in an Educational Setting
    Gelkop, Nava
    Burshtein, Dikla Gol
    Lahav, Anat
    Brezner, Amichi
    Al-Oraibi, Saleh
    Ferre, Claudio L.
    Gordon, Andrew M.
    PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2015, 35 (01) : 24 - 39
  • [24] CONSTRAINT-INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY VS BIMANUAL INTENSIVE TRAINING IN HEMIPLEGIC CEREBRAL PALSY: PRELIMINARY RESULTS
    Rizzotto, Melissa Rosa
    Dalla Pozza, Laura Visona
    Turconi, Anna Carla
    Facchin, Paola
    Fedrizzi, Ermellina
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2010, 14 (06) : 547 - 548
  • [25] Optimizing Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Children With Cerebral Palsy
    Smith, Alyssa E.
    Aravamuthan, Bhooma
    PEDIATRICS, 2021, 148 (05)
  • [26] Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Trial
    Ramey, Sharon Landesman
    DeLuca, Stephanie C.
    Stevenson, Richard D.
    Conaway, Mark
    Darragh, Amy R.
    Lo, Warren
    PEDIATRICS, 2021, 148 (05)
  • [27] Effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy as compared to bimanual therapy in upper motor function outcome in child with hemiplegic cerebral palsy
    Zafer, Hira
    Amjad, Imran
    Malik, Arshad Nawaz
    Shaukat, Enfall
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (01) : 181 - 184
  • [28] Constraint-induced movement therapy improves upper extremity motor function after stroke - Commentary
    Kwakkel, Gert
    Rietberg, Marc
    van Wegen, Erwin
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY, 2007, 53 (02): : 132 - 132
  • [29] COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL THERAPY, INTENSIVE THERAPY AND MODIFIED CONSTRAINT-INDUCED MOVEMENT THERAPY TO IMPROVE UPPER EXTREMITY FUNCTION AFTER STROKE
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhao, Jing-Li
    Zhu, Qi-Xiu
    Li, Jiang
    Meng, Ping-Ping
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (07) : 619 - 625
  • [30] Proprioceptive based training or modified constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity motor functions in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled study
    Alaca, Nuray
    Ocal, Numan Melik
    NEUROREHABILITATION, 2022, 51 (02) : 271 - 282