Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes

被引:54
作者
Haley, Stephen M.
Siebens, Hilary
Coster, Wendy J.
Tao, Wei
Black-Schaffer, Randie M.
Gandek, Barbara
Sinclair, Samuel J.
Ni, Pengsheng
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Hlth & Disabil Res Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Rehabil Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sargent Coll Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy & Rehabil Counseling, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[6] Hlth Assessment Lab, Waltham, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 08期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); psychometrics; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.020
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. Design: Longitudinal, prospective I-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. Setting: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. Participants: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). Results: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. Conclusions: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1042
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]  
Rosenthal R., 2008, Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis, V3rd ed.
[32]  
Samejima F., 1997, The graded response model, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4757-2691-6
[33]   INTRACLASS CORRELATIONS - USES IN ASSESSING RATER RELIABILITY [J].
SHROUT, PE ;
FLEISS, JL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (02) :420-428
[34]   Measuring physical function in patients with complex medical and postsurgical conditions - A computer adaptive approach [J].
Siebens, H ;
Andres, PL ;
Ni, PS ;
Coster, WJ ;
Haley, SM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 84 (10) :741-748
[35]  
*SUNY, 1997, GUID UN DAT SYST MED
[36]   INTEROBSERVER AGREEMENT FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF HANDICAP IN STROKE PATIENTS [J].
VANSWIETEN, JC ;
KOUDSTAAL, PJ ;
VISSER, MC ;
SCHOUTEN, HJA ;
VANGIJN, J .
STROKE, 1988, 19 (05) :604-607
[37]  
Wainer H, 2000, COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIV
[38]   Precision of warm's weighted likelihood estimates for a polytomous model in computerized adaptive testing [J].
Wang, SD ;
Wang, TY .
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2001, 25 (04) :317-331
[39]   Item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: Implications for outcomes measurement in rehabilitation [J].
Ware, JE ;
Sinclair, SJ ;
Gandek, B ;
Bjorner, JB .
REHABILITATION PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 50 (01) :71-78
[40]   Applications of computerized adaptive testing (CAT) to the assessment of headache impact [J].
Ware, JE ;
Kosinski, M ;
Bjorner, JB ;
Bayliss, MS ;
Batenhorst, A ;
Dahlöf, CGH ;
Tepper, S ;
Dowson, A .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2003, 12 (08) :935-952