Computerized adaptive testing for follow-up after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation: I. Activity outcomes

被引:54
作者
Haley, Stephen M.
Siebens, Hilary
Coster, Wendy J.
Tao, Wei
Black-Schaffer, Randie M.
Gandek, Barbara
Sinclair, Samuel J.
Ni, Pengsheng
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Hlth & Disabil Res Inst, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Rehabil Med, Charlottesville, VA USA
[3] Boston Univ, Sargent Coll Hlth & Rehabil Sci, Dept Occupat Therapy & Rehabil Counseling, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[6] Hlth Assessment Lab, Waltham, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 08期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); psychometrics; rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.020
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine score agreement, precision, validity, efficiency, and responsiveness of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC-CAT) in a prospective, 3-month follow-up sample of inpatient rehabilitation patients recently discharged home. Design: Longitudinal, prospective I-group cohort study of patients followed approximately 2 weeks after hospital discharge and then 3 months after the initial home visit. Setting: Follow-up visits conducted in patients' home setting. Participants: Ninety-four adults who were recently discharged from inpatient rehabilitation, with diagnoses of neurologic, orthopedic, and medically complex conditions. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Summary scores from AM-PAC-CAT, including 3 activity domains of movement and physical, personal care and instrumental, and applied cognition were compared with scores from a traditional fixed-length version of the AM-PAC with 66 items (AM-PAC-66). Results: AM-PAC-CAT scores were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1 range, .77-.86) with scores from the AM-PAC-66. On average, the CAT programs required 43% of the time and 33% of the items compared with the AM-PAC-66. Both formats discriminated across functional severity groups. The standardized response mean (SRM) was greater for the movement and physical fixed form than the CAT; the effect size and SRM of the 2 other AM-PAC domains showed similar sensitivity between CAT and fixed formats. Using patients' own report as an anchor-based measure of change, the CAT and fixed length formats were comparable in responsiveness to patient-reported change over a 3-month interval. Conclusions: Accurate estimates for functional activity group-level changes can be obtained from CAT administrations, with a considerable reduction in administration time.
引用
收藏
页码:1033 / 1042
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Andres Patricia L, 2004, Top Stroke Rehabil, V11, P33
[2]   Is patient-reported function reliable for monitoring postacute outcomes? [J].
Andres, PL ;
Haley, SM ;
Ni, PS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (08) :614-621
[3]   Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research [J].
Andresen, EM .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S15-S20
[4]   Six-item screener to identify cognitive impairment among potential subjects for clinical research [J].
Callahan, CM ;
Unverzagt, FW ;
Hui, SL ;
Perkins, AJ ;
Hendrie, HC .
MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (09) :771-781
[5]   Combining anchor and distribution-based methods to derive minimal clinically important differences on the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) anemia and fatigue scales [J].
Cella, D ;
Eton, DT ;
Lai, JS ;
Peterman, AH ;
Merkel, DE .
JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (06) :547-561
[6]   Meaningful change in cancer-specific quality of life scores: Differences between improvement and worsening [J].
Cella, D ;
Hahn, EA ;
Dineen, K .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2002, 11 (03) :207-221
[7]   Measuring patient-reported outcomes after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation settings [J].
Coster, WJ ;
Haley, SM ;
Jette, AM .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2006, 38 (04) :237-242
[8]   Development of an applied cognition scale to measure rehabilitation outcomes [J].
Coster, WJ ;
Haley, SM ;
Ludlow, LH ;
Andres, PL ;
Ni, PS .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2004, 85 (12) :2030-2035
[9]   Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement - Personal core and instrumental activities domain [J].
Coster, WJ ;
Haley, SM ;
Andres, PL ;
Ludlow, LH ;
Bond, TLY ;
Ni, PS .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (01) :62-72
[10]   A COMPARISON OF 5 STROKE SCALES WITH MEASURES OF DISABILITY, HANDICAP, AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
DEHAAN, R ;
HORN, J ;
LIMBURG, M ;
VANDERMEULEN, J ;
BOSSUYT, P .
STROKE, 1993, 24 (08) :1178-1181