Multifidelity Monte Carlo Estimation with Adaptive Low-Fidelity Models

被引:29
作者
Peherstorfer, Benjamin [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Courant Inst Math Sci, New York, NY 10012 USA
关键词
uncertainty quantification; model reduction; multifidelity; multilevel; Monte Carlo; surrogate models; PARTIAL-DIFFERENTIAL-EQUATIONS; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; ELLIPTIC PDES; UNCERTAINTY; REDUCTION; APPROXIMATION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1137/17M1159208
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Multifidelity Monte Carlo (MFMC) estimation combines low- and high-fidelity models to speed up the estimation of statistics of the high-fidelity model outputs. MFMC optimally samples the low-and high-fidelity models such that the MFMC estimator has minimal mean-squared error (MSE) for a given computational budget. In the setup of MFMC, the low-fidelity models are static; i.e., they are given and fixed and cannot be changed and adapted. We introduce the adaptive MFMC (AMFMC) method that splits the computational budget between adapting the low-fidelity models to improve their approximation quality and sampling the low- and high-fidelity models to reduce the MSE of the estimator. Our AMFMC approach derives the quasi-optimal balance between adaptation and sampling in the sense that our approach minimizes an upper bound of the MSE, instead of the error directly. We show that the quasi-optimal number of adaptations of the low-fidelity models is bounded even in the limit of an infinite budget. This shows that adapting low-fidelity models in MFMC beyond a certain approximation accuracy is unnecessary and can even be wasteful. Our AMFMC approach trades off adaptation and sampling and so avoids overadaptation of the low-fidelity models. Besides the costs of adapting low-fidelity models, our AMFMC approach can also take into account the costs of the initial construction of the low-fidelity models ("offline costs"), which is critical if low-fidelity models are computationally expensive to build such as reduced models and data-fit surrogate models. Numerical results demonstrate that our adaptive approach can achieve orders of magnitude speedups compared to MFMC estimators with static low-fidelity models and compared to Monte Carlo estimators that use the high-fidelity model alone.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 603
页数:25
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Amaral S, 2017, STAT COMPUT, V27, P625, DOI 10.1007/s11222-016-9644-3
  • [2] Descartes' rule of signs revisited
    Anderson, B
    Jackson, J
    Sitharam, M
    [J]. AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1998, 105 (05) : 447 - 451
  • [3] A Survey of Projection-Based Model Reduction Methods for Parametric Dynamical Systems
    Benner, Peter
    Gugercin, Serkan
    Willcox, Karen
    [J]. SIAM REVIEW, 2015, 57 (04) : 483 - 531
  • [4] Bransford J., 2005, PREPARING TEACHERS C, P1, DOI DOI 10.1109/CLUSTR.2005.347090
  • [5] MODEL REDUCTION FOR LARGE-SCALE SYSTEMS WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL PARAMETRIC INPUT SPACE
    Bui-Thanh, T.
    Willcox, K.
    Ghattas, O.
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2008, 30 (06) : 3270 - 3288
  • [6] One-dimensional global optimization for observations with noise
    Calvin, JM
    Zilinskas, A
    [J]. COMPUTERS & MATHEMATICS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2005, 50 (1-2) : 157 - 169
  • [7] Analysis and Finite Element Approximation of a Coupled, Continuum Pipe-Flow/Darcy Model for Flow in Porous Media with Embedded Conduits
    Cao, Yanzhao
    Gunzburger, Max
    Hua, Fei
    Wang, Xiaoming
    [J]. NUMERICAL METHODS FOR PARTIAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS, 2011, 27 (05) : 1242 - 1252
  • [8] LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines
    Chang, Chih-Chung
    Lin, Chih-Jen
    [J]. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 2 (03)
  • [9] FINITE ELEMENT ERROR ANALYSIS OF ELLIPTIC PDES WITH RANDOM COEFFICIENTS AND ITS APPLICATION TO MULTILEVEL MONTE CARLO METHODS
    Charrier, J.
    Scheichl, R.
    Teckentrup, A. L.
    [J]. SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 51 (01) : 322 - 352
  • [10] Reduced Basis Methods for Uncertainty Quantification
    Chen, Peng
    Quarteroni, Alfio
    Rozza, Gianluigi
    [J]. SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2017, 5 (01): : 813 - 869