Basic Requirements of heart surgery Units for the Treatment of Patients with congenital Heart defects Consensus Paper of the Board of Management of the German Society for Thoracic-, Cardiac- and Vascular Surgery (DGTHG) and the German Society for Paediatric Cardiology (DGPK)

This document defines fundamental structures of congenital cardiac surgery departments in Germany. It has been developed by the executive boards of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (GSTCVS) and the German Society of Pediatric Cardiology (GSPC) in collaboration with the working group for Congenital and Pediatric Heart Surgery of the GSTCVS This updated consensus paper is based on a previous publication of the European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery (EACTS) and is a refinement and adaptation of its initial version published by the GSTCVS in 2005. In Germany, pediatric cardiology and cardiac surgery facilities caring for patients with congenital cardiac defects are subject to certain regulations. For example, in 2010 the Federal Joint Committee implemented the resolution on Quality Assurance Measures in the Provision of Cardiac Surgical Care for Children and Adolescents (directive congenital cardiac surgery) which regulates structural and process quality compulsorily. To date, fundamental and considerable differences of the respective departments persist. Congenital cardiac surgery departments have to provide the whole spectrum of the cardiac surgical therapy from the neonate to the adult with congenital cardiac defects (with the exception of heart transplantation) continuously and with the appropriate experience. Furthermore, the departments have to prove their constant scientific activity and ensure that they facilitate education and training for the specialty certification in cardiac surgery. The responsible surgeons of all congenital cardiac surgery departments commit to participate in the currently voluntary national quality assurance for congenital cardiac defects of the GSTCVS and the GSPC and perform an individual surgical outcome assessment and risk stratification. This is supplemented by the willingness for external certification specific to the individual and the facilitation of peer review procedures for quality assurance purposes. Additional measures, such as collaboration in clinical research and ongoing interdisciplinary education and training, are preferable.