The HPWS and AMO: a dynamic study of system- and individual-level effects

被引:19
作者
Edgar, Fiona [1 ]
Zhang, Jing A. [1 ]
Blaker, Nancy M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Otago, Dept Management, Dunedin, New Zealand
关键词
AMO; HPWS; Task performance; Contextual performance; HUMAN-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS; ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR; MEDIATING ROLE; HRM PRACTICES; BLACK-BOX; PLS-SEM; MOTIVATION; MODEL; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1108/IJM-12-2019-0541
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose Drawing on the dynamic model of ability, motivation, opportunity (AMO) for human resource research, this study aims to examine how organizational system-level (i.e. the high-performance work system (HPWS)) and individual-level AMO affect employees' performance. Specifically, this paper proposes that employee task performance is resultant from the integration of system- and individual-level AMO factors with employee contextual performance. Design/methodology/approach A survey design is employed with data collected from 250 employees working in New Zealand's service sector. Findings This study finds both organizational system (HPWS) and individual AMO dimensions have positive associations with employees' performance. At the system level, the supportive role played by contextual performance is highlighted with pro-social behaviors fully mediating the relationship between the HPWS and task performance. At the individual level, contextual performance is found to partially mediate the relationship between ability and task performance and fully mediate the relationship between motivation and task performance. Opportunity, on the other hand, is significantly associated with task but not contextual performance. Originality/value In acknowledging there are a plurality of factors that impact performance, this study enriches our understanding of AMO's influence in the context of people management.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 809
页数:16
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LINE MANAGER BEHAVIOR, PERCEIVED HRM PRACTICES, AND INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE: EXAMINING THE MEDIATING ROLE OF ENGAGEMENT
    Alfes, Kerstin
    Truss, Catherine
    Soane, Emma C.
    Rees, Chris
    Gatenby, Mark
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2013, 52 (06) : 839 - 859
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.2001.4845847
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1986, Exchange Power in Social Life
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, APA HDB IND ORG PSYC
  • [5] The Pervasiveness And Trajectory Of Methodological Choices: A 20-Year Review Of Human Resource Management Research
    Bainbridge, Hugh T. J.
    Sanders, Karin
    Cogin, Julie A.
    Lin, Cai-Hui
    [J]. HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, 2017, 56 (06) : 887 - 913
  • [6] SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) : 122 - 147
  • [7] Motivation sources inventory: Development and validation of new scales to measure an integrative taxonomy of motivation
    Barbuto, JE
    Scholl, RW
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1998, 82 (03) : 1011 - 1022
  • [8] FIRM RESOURCES AND SUSTAINED COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
    BARNEY, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 1991, 17 (01) : 99 - 120
  • [9] Becker BE, 1997, HUM RESOURCE MANAGE, V36, P39, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-050X(199721)36:1<39::AID-HRM8>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-X