Randomized controlled trial to assess the short-term effectiveness of tailored web- and text-based facilitation of smoking cessation in primary care (iQuit in Practice)

被引:71
作者
Naughton, Felix [1 ]
Jamison, James [1 ]
Boase, Sue [1 ]
Sloan, Melanie [1 ]
Gilbert, Hazel [2 ]
Prevost, A. Toby [1 ,3 ]
Mason, Dan [1 ]
Smith, Susan [1 ]
Brimicombe, James [1 ]
Evans, Robert [1 ]
Sutton, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Inst Publ, Behav Sci Grp, Cambridge, England
[2] UCL Med Sch, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Dept Primary Care & Publ Hlth Sci, London WC2R 2LS, England
关键词
Cessation advice; computer tailoring; primary care; self-help; smoking cessation; text messaging; ADVICE LETTERS; SUPPORT; MESSAGE; SMOKERS; ACCEPTABILITY; FEASIBILITY; TXT2STOP;
D O I
10.1111/add.12556
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Aims To estimate the short-term effectiveness, feasibility and acceptability of a smoking cessation intervention (the iQuit system) that consists of tailored printed and Short Message Service (SMS) text message self-help delivered as an adjunct to cessation support in primary care to inform the design of a definitive trial. Design A stratified two parallel-group randomized controlled trial comparing usual care (control) with usual care plus the iQuit system (intervention), delivered by primary care nurses/healthcare assistants who were blinded to the allocation sequence. Setting Thirty-two general practice (GP) surgeries in England, UK. Participants A total of 602 smokers initiating smoking cessation support from their local GP surgery were randomized (control n=303, intervention n=299). Measurements Primary outcome was self-reported 2-week point prevalence abstinence at 8 weeks follow-up. Secondary smoking outcomes and feasibility and acceptability measures were collected at 4 weeks after quit date, 8 weeks and 6 months follow-up. Findings There were no significant between-group differences in the primary outcome [control 40.3%, iQuit 45.2%; odds ratio (OR)=1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.88-1.69] or in secondary short-term smoking outcomes. Six-month prolonged abstinence was significantly higher in the iQuit arm (control 8.9%, iQuit 15.1%; OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.09-3.01). iQuit support took on average 7.7 minutes (standard deviation=4.0) to deliver and 18.9% (95% CI=14.8-23.7%) of intervention participants discontinued the text message support during the programme. Conclusions Tailored printed and text message self-help delivered alongside routine smoking cessation support in primary care does not significantly increase short-term abstinence, but may increase long-term abstinence and demonstrated feasibility and acceptability compared with routine cessation support alone.
引用
收藏
页码:1184 / 1193
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], LOC STOP SMOK SERV S
[3]  
[Anonymous], STAT NHS STOP SMOK S
[4]  
[Anonymous], STAND TRAIN SMOK CES
[5]  
[Anonymous], SMOK CESS SERV PRIM
[6]   Weekly versus basic smoking cessation support in primary care:: a randomised controlled trial [J].
Aveyard, Paul ;
Brown, Karen ;
Saunders, Cas ;
Alexander, Avril ;
Johnstone, Elaine ;
Munafo, Marcus R. ;
Murphy, Mike .
THORAX, 2007, 62 (10) :898-903
[7]  
Bandura A, 1986, Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[8]   The effectiveness of personally tailored computer-generated advice letters for smoking cessation [J].
Borland, R ;
Balmford, J ;
Hunt, D .
ADDICTION, 2004, 99 (03) :369-377
[9]   Cessation assistance reported by smokers in 15 countries participating in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) policy evaluation surveys [J].
Borland, Ron ;
Li, Lin ;
Driezen, Pete ;
Wilson, Nick ;
Hammond, David ;
Thompson, Mary E. ;
Fong, Geoffrey T. ;
Mons, Ute ;
Willemsen, Marc C. ;
McNeill, Ann ;
Thrasher, James F. ;
Cummings, K. Michael .
ADDICTION, 2012, 107 (01) :197-205
[10]   Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation [J].
Dijkstra, A .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (05) :527-539