Beyond text: exploring ethos and method in co-producing research with communities

被引:63
作者
Beebeejaun, Yasminah [1 ]
Durose, Catherine [2 ]
Rees, James [3 ]
Richardson, Joanna [4 ]
Richardson, Liz [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Planning, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Inst Local Govt Studies, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Birmingham, Res Ctr, Sect 3, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[4] De Montfort Univ, Dept Polit & Publ Policy, Leicester LE1 9BH, Leics, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
关键词
COPRODUCTION; PARTICIPATION; EXPERIENCE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1093/cdj/bst008
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
There is a critique of research conducted in communities which fails to include communities in its design and undertaking. In parallel, academic research is increasingly being measured according to its benefit to the wider society. Co-productive research is a response to these challenges which offers a way of recognizing the resource contribution of communities to research and emphasizing the conduct of research with communities rather than on communities. This article identifies the reliance on text in the research process as a barrier to delivering meaningful co-productive research with communities. Beyond-text tools are emerging across academic disciplines and include story-telling, performance, art and photography. Recent research emphasizes the empowering potential of these methods by facilitating greater reflection on the lived experience of those involved. This article looks at examples of research which have employed beyond text methods to consider their potential to deliver co-produced research with communities. It also asks whether it is the application of specific technical approaches and methods, or the underlying ethos within which research is conducted that is most critical to challenging unequal power relationships. It argues that beyond-text methods need to be applied within a wider set of values which re-conceptualize the role of the researcher working with communities.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 53
页数:17
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] From community participation to organizational therapy? World Cafe and Appreciative Inquiry as research methods
    Aldred, Rachel
    [J]. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 46 (01) : 57 - 71
  • [2] [Anonymous], CONTENTIOUS SPACES G
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, FORUM QUAL SOC RES, DOI DOI 10.17169/FQS-9.2.391
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Towards co-production in research with communities
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2011, JOHN BENJAMINS
  • [6] [Anonymous], REFLECTIONS COMMUNIT
  • [7] Bennett F., 2004, From Input to Influence: Participatory Approaches to Research and Inquiry into Poverty
  • [8] Berger J., 1972, Ways of seeing
  • [9] Bexley A., 2007, ASIA PACIFIC J ANTHR, V8, P279
  • [10] Boeck T., 2010, AMPLIFIED LEICESTER