Efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg compared with cetirizine 10 mg and placebo for the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study

被引:89
作者
Kuna, P. [1 ]
Bachert, C. [2 ]
Nowacki, Z. [3 ]
van Cauwenberge, P. [2 ]
Agache, I. [4 ]
Fouquert, L. [5 ]
Roger, A. [6 ]
Sologuren, A. [7 ]
Valiente, R. [7 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Lodz, Barlicki Univ Hosp, Div Internal Med Asthma & Allergy, PL-90153 Lodz, Poland
[2] UZ Gent, Ghent, Belgium
[3] Specjalistyczne Gabinety Lekarskie Allergia Sc, Krakow, Poland
[4] Radoi Mariana SR, Brasov, Romania
[5] Cabinet Pneumol Allergol, Grasse, France
[6] Hosp Badalona Germans Trias & Pujol, Badalona, Spain
[7] FAES FARMA SA, Dept Clin Res, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
bilastine; cetirizine; H-1; antihistamine; nasal symptoms score; non-nasal symptoms score; seasonal allergic rhinitis; total symptom score; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; IMPACT; ANTIHISTAMINES; HISTAMINE; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03257.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
P>Background Bilastine is a new non-sedative H-1 receptor antagonist, indicated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR) (seasonal and perennial). Objective To assess and compare the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs. cetirizine 10 mg and placebo in relieving the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Methods Overall, 683 SAR patients, aged 12-70 years, were randomized to a double-blind treatment with bilastine 20 mg, cetirizine 10 mg or placebo, once daily for 14 days, in 61 centres across Europe. Patients recorded reflective (over the past 12 h) and instantaneous nasal (obstruction, rhinorrhoea, itching and sneezing) and non-nasal (ocular tearing, redness and itching) symptom scores (NSS and NNSS, respectively) twice daily, according to a pre-determined severity scale to provide reflective and instantaneous total symptom scores (TSS). The primary efficacy measure was the area under curve (AUC) of reflective TSS over 14 days of treatment (TSS-AUC(0-14 days)). Secondary efficacy measures included mean change from baseline in TSS, NSS and NNSS; discomfort caused by AR; and investigator's clinical global impression of the treatment. Safety was assessed according to adverse events (AEs), laboratory tests and electrocardiograms. Results The mean TSS-AUC(0-14 days) (score x day) was reduced in bilastine- and cetirizine-treated groups to a similar and significantly greater extent, compared with placebo (76.5, 72.3 and 100.6, respectively; P < 0.001). Similarly, bilastine and cetirizine were comparable and significantly superior to placebo for all secondary outcomes. While all treatments were well tolerated and the AE profiles of bilastine and placebo were similar, significantly fewer patients in the bilastine-treated group experienced somnolence (1.8%; P < 0.001) and fatigue (0.4%; P=0.02) than patients in the cetirizine-treated group (7.5% and 4.8%, respectively). Conclusions Bilastine 20 mg once daily was significantly superior to placebo and comparable to cetirizine 10 mg in relieving symptoms of SAR, although it demonstrated a significantly better AE profile than cetirizine.
引用
收藏
页码:1338 / 1347
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   The role of histamine in allergic disease: re-appraisal of its inflammatory potential [J].
Bachert, C .
ALLERGY, 2002, 57 (04) :287-296
[2]   Comparison of the efficacy and safety of bilastine 20 mg vs desloratadine 5 mg in seasonal allergic rhinitis patients [J].
Bachert, C. ;
Kuna, P. ;
Sanquer, F. ;
Ivan, P. ;
Dimitrov, V. ;
Gorina, M. M. ;
van de Heyning, P. ;
Loureiro, A. .
ALLERGY, 2009, 64 (01) :158-165
[3]   Prevalence and rate of diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in Europe [J].
Bauchau, V ;
Durham, SR .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2004, 24 (05) :758-764
[4]  
*BMI, F96221 BMI
[5]   Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) 2008 update (in collaboration with the World Health Organization, GA2LEN and AllerGen) [J].
Bousquet, J. ;
Khaltaev, N. ;
Cruz, A. A. ;
Denburg, J. ;
Fokkens, W. J. ;
Togias, A. ;
Zuberbier, T. ;
Baena-Cagnani, C. E. ;
Canonica, G. W. ;
van Weel, C. ;
Agache, I. ;
Ait-Khaled, N. ;
Bachert, C. ;
Blaiss, M. S. ;
Bonini, S. ;
Boulet, L. -P. ;
Bousquet, P. -J. ;
Camargos, P. ;
Carlsen, K. -H. ;
Chen, Y. ;
Custovic, A. ;
Dahl, R. ;
Demoly, P. ;
Douagui, H. ;
Durham, S. R. ;
van Wijk, R. Gerth ;
Kalayci, O. ;
Kaliner, M. A. ;
Kim, Y. -Y. ;
Kowalski, M. L. ;
Kuna, P. ;
Le, L. T. T. ;
Lemiere, C. ;
Li, J. ;
Lockey, R. F. ;
Mavale-Manuel, S. ;
Meltzer, E. O. ;
Mohammad, Y. ;
Mullol, J. ;
Naclerio, R. ;
Hehir, R. E. O. ;
Ohta, K. ;
Ouedraogo, S. ;
Palkonen, S. ;
Papadopoulos, N. ;
Passalacqua, G. ;
Pawankar, R. ;
Popov, T. A. ;
Rabe, K. F. ;
Rosado-Pinto, J. .
ALLERGY, 2008, 63 :8-+
[6]   Preclinical pharmacology of bilastine, a new selective histamine H 1 receptor antagonist: Receptor selectivity and in Vitro antihistaminic activity [J].
Corcóstegui R. ;
Labeaga L. ;
Innerárity A. ;
Berisa A. ;
Orjales A. .
Drugs in R & D, 2005, 6 (6) :371-384
[7]   In vivo pharmacological characterisation of bilastine, a potent and selective histamine H1 receptor antagonist [J].
Corcóstegui R. ;
Labeaga L. ;
Innerárity A. ;
Berisa A. ;
Orjales A. .
Drugs in R & D, 2006, 7 (4) :219-231
[8]  
Demoly P, 2000, REV MAL RESPIR, V17, P925
[9]   Validation of the classification of ARIA (allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma) [J].
Demoly, P ;
Allaert, FA ;
Lecasble, M ;
Bousquet, J .
ALLERGY, 2003, 58 (07) :672-675
[10]  
*EMEA, 2004, CHMPEWP2455 EMEA