Multi-layered and multi-dimensional suitability evaluation of tubular daylight guidance systems

被引:3
作者
Lu, Shilei [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Zewen [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Minchao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, 92 Weijin Rd, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjin Univ, Tianjin Key Lab Built Environm & Energy Applicat, Tianjin, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
Tubular daylight guidance systems; Multiple layer; Multiple dimensions; Suitability; GREEN BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES; LIGHT-PIPE; PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101820
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Aimed at the promotion of tubular daylight guidance systems, a set of multi-layered and multi-dimensional methods for suitability are explored in this paper. Among them, "Multi-layered" refers to the staged evaluation based on different types of influencing factors, and "multi-dimensional" refers to technology performance, economic benefit, and human satisfaction, considering different concerns of national standards, developers, and user groups. The three layers in this method are 1) preliminary evaluation based on the pre-requisites for technology application, 2) single-dimensional evaluation based on demand and 3) comprehensive evaluation based on multi-dimensional suitability. In layer 1, screening principles and screening methods are formulated; in layer 2, the weight of the evaluation index is obtained by the binary comparative analysis method based on the expert questionnaire, and the evaluation result is given by the scoring method; and in layer 3, the TOPSIS (Technique for Order reference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) is used to obtain the queueing index value, and the weights are calculated by combining subjective and objective methods. The final evaluation is obtained by the linear weighted sum method and exponential evaluation baseline method. The tubular daylight guidance systems in a teaching building of a university in Tianjin were taken as an analysis case to demonstrate the application of this method. The results indicate that the weighted final evaluation value of the case is 0.16 and the application of case is "relatively appropriate". This approach achieves the multi-dimensional evaluation of the suitability of tubular daylight guidance systems and makes the evaluation more reasonable.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Tubular guidance systems for daylight: Achieved and predicted installation performances [J].
Al-Marwaee, Mohammed ;
Carter, David .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2006, 83 (07) :774-788
[2]  
Building Research Establishmen, 2017, BREEAM INT NEW CONST
[3]   Tubular guidance systems for daylight: UK case studies [J].
Carter, D. J. .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2008, 36 (05) :520-535
[4]   User attitudes toward tubular daylight guidance systems Reply to comment [J].
Carter, D. J. ;
Al Marwaee, M. .
LIGHTING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 41 (01) :87-88
[5]   Developments in tubular daylight guidance systems [J].
Carter, DJ .
BUILDING RESEARCH AND INFORMATION, 2004, 32 (03) :220-234
[6]   A comprehensive review on passive design approaches in green building rating tools [J].
Chen, Xi ;
Yang, Hongxing ;
Lu, Lin .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 50 :1425-1436
[7]  
China Academy of Building Research, 2013, STAND LIGHT DES BUIL
[8]  
China Academy of Building Research, 2019, ASS STAND GREEN BUIL
[9]  
CIE, 2012, TUB DAYL GUID SYST
[10]   Strategies to promote green building technologies adoption in developing countries: The case of Ghana [J].
Darko, Amos ;
Chan, Albert Ping Chuen .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 130 :74-84