Subjective Effects of Alcohol Predict Alcohol Choice in Social Drinkers

被引:3
作者
Li, Jingfei [1 ]
Murray, Conor H. [1 ]
Weafer, Jessica [1 ,2 ]
de Wit, Harriet [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chicago, Dept Psychiat & Behav Neurosci, 5841 S Maryland Ave MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Psychol, 205 Kastle Hall, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
来源
ALCOHOL-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH | 2020年 / 44卷 / 12期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Alcohol; Drug Choice; Subjective Effects; Mood; Social Drinkers; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; ABUSE LIABILITY; RESPONSES; DRINKING; STIMULANT; DRUGS; RISK; SENSITIVITY; LIKING; BRAIN;
D O I
10.1111/acer.14476
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Alcohol is among the most commonly used psychoactive drugs, yet it can produce markedly different subjective effects in different people. Certain effects, including both heightened stimulatory effects and lesser sedative effects, are thought to predict repeated or excessive use. However, we do not fully understand the nature of these individual differences or their relationships to alcohol consumption. This controlled laboratory study examined subjective and physiologic responses to a moderate dose of alcohol in social drinkers in relation to the subjects' decision to consume alcohol. Methods Healthy adult volunteers (N = 95) participated in a 5-session double-blind alcohol choice study. On the first 4 sessions, they received alcohol (0.8 g/kg) and placebo in alternating order, and on the fifth session, they chose and consumed whichever of the 2 they preferred. During each session, participants completed the Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Biphasic Alcohol Effects Scale (BAES) questionnaires and had their vitals recorded every 30 minutes. We compared subjective and physiologic response to alcohol during the sampling sessions in participants who chose alcohol or placebo on session 5. Results Of the 95 participants, 55 chose alcohol (choosers) and 40 chose placebo (nonchoosers). In the full sample, alcohol produced its expected effects (e.g., increased friendliness, elation, and vigor (POMS), and stimulation and sedation (BAES)). The chooser and nonchooser groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, blood alcohol levels, or cardiovascular measures. However, the choosers experienced greater alcohol-induced increases in positive mood (POMS) and liked the drug more, whereas the nonchoosers experienced greater anger, anxiety (POMS), and sedation (BAES) after alcohol. Conclusion Both greater positive mood effects and lesser sedative effects after alcohol predicted preference under controlled conditions, suggesting that both factors can predict future consumption of alcohol.
引用
收藏
页码:2579 / 2587
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条