Down's syndrome screening with nuchal translucency at 12+0-14+0 weeks and maternal serum markers at 14+1-17+0 weeks:: a prospective study

被引:18
作者
Rozenberg, P
Malagrida, L
Cuckle, H
Durand-Zaleski, I
Nisand, I
Audibert, F
Benattar, C
Tribalat, S
Cartron, M
Lemarie, P
Stoessel, J
Capolagui, P
Jansé-Marec, J
Barbier, D
Allouch, C
Perdu, M
Roberto, A
Lahna, Z
Giudicelli, Y
Ville, Y
机构
[1] Poissy St Germain Hosp, Ctr Hosp Poissy St Germain, F-78303 Poissy, France
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Paris 12, Hop Henri Mondor, Publ Hlth Evaluat & Study Unit, F-94000 Creteil, France
[4] Hop Antoine Beclere, F-92140 Clamart, France
[5] Dreux Hosp, F-28199 Dreux, France
[6] Metz Thionville Hosp, F-57000 Metz, France
[7] Franco Britann Hosp, F-92300 Levallois Perret, France
[8] Evreux Hosp, F-27000 Evreux, France
关键词
alpha-fetoprotein; Down's syndrome; free beta-HCG; screening; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/17.4.1093
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Sonographic and biochemical methods for Down's syndrome screening have developed simultaneously, but independently. As a consequence, the rate of invasive procedures for fetal karyotyping has dramatically increased and become an important public health issue which needs to be controlled. One approach is to combine sonographic and biochemical results into a single risk assessment. Methods: In a multicentre interventional study, nuchal translucency (NT) was measured between 12(+0) and 14(+0) weeks of gestation. Maternal serum markers (MSM) were measured between 14(+1) and 17+(0) weeks of gestation. Karyotyping was advised when: (i) NT was greater than or equal to3 mm; or (ii) the MSM-related risk was greater than or equal to1 in 250 at term. Karyotyping was delayed until after a maternal blood sample had been taken. NT and MSM were expressed as multiples of the medians (MoMs), and risks were calculated and tailored to the study population. A combined risk for NT and MSM was estimated retrospectively. Costs per case diagnosed, and the cost per case averted were calculated for the three screening strategies. Results: A total of 9444 women was screened. Twenty-one fetuses (0.22%) had Down's syndrome, whilst 326 women (3.4%) were lost to follow-up. Among 9118 women followed up, 5506 had both NT and MSM, 821 had only NT, and 2791 had only MSM. Median maternal age was 30.5 years. False-positive rates for NT, MSM and NT combined with MSM were 3.0, 5.8 and 0.23% respectively. The false-positive rate generated by a sequential two-stage screening was 8.6%. Detection rates of Down's syndrome were 62 and 55% for NT and MSM respectively. Seven cases with Down's syndrome (35%) had raised NT and MSM, and 17 (81%) had either raised NT, MSM, or both. For a 5% false-positive rate, detection rates were 55 and 80% for NT alone and for combined NT and MSM respectively. Ultrasound alone appears to be more cost-effective (pound50 per case diagnosed) than both tests (pound61 per case diagnosed). Conclusions: The study results suggest a 25% increase in the detection rate of Down's syndrome using a combination of NT measurement at 12(+0)-14(+0) weeks and MSM at 14(+1)-17(+0) weeks for a 5% false-positive rate, with modest increase in cost.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1098
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*ASS ABA, 1999, MED FAETALE, V37, P11
[2]   Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester ultrasound and second-trimester maternal serum markers in a low-risk population: a prospective longitudinal study [J].
Audibert, F ;
Dommergues, M ;
Benattar, C ;
Taieb, J ;
Thalabard, JC ;
Frydman, R .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 18 (01) :26-31
[3]  
BEWLEY S, 1995, BRIT J OBSTET GYNAEC, V102, P386, DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb11290.x
[4]   IMPROVED PARAMETERS FOR RISK-ESTIMATION IN DOWNS-SYNDROME SCREENING [J].
CUCKLE, H .
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 1995, 15 (11) :1057-1065
[5]  
CUCKLE H, 1996, EARLY HUM DEV, V47, P27
[6]  
Cuckle HS, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P505, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199906)19:6<505::AID-PD572>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-6
[8]   USING DECISION-ANALYSIS TO COMPARE POLICIES FOR ANTENATAL SCREENING FOR DOWNS-SYNDROME [J].
FLETCHER, J ;
HICKS, NR ;
KAY, JDS ;
BOYD, PA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (7001) :351-356
[9]   Justifying prenatal screening and genetic amniocentesis programs by cost-effectiveness analyses: A re-evaluation [J].
Ganiats, TG .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1996, 16 (01) :45-50
[10]  
GILBERT RE, 2001, BRIT MED J, V323, P123