Impact of storage competition on energy markets

被引:13
作者
Cruise, James R. [1 ]
Flatley, Lisa [2 ]
Zachary, Stan [1 ]
机构
[1] Heriot Watt Univ, Sch Math & Comp Sci, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, Midlothian, Scotland
[2] Univ Warwick, Math Inst, Zeeman Bldg, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Economics; Auctions/bidding; Multi-agent systems; OR in energy; SUPPLY FUNCTION EQUILIBRIA; ELECTRICITY; STRATEGIES; SYSTEMS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.036
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
We study how storage, operating as a price maker within a market environment, may be optimally operated over an extended period of time. The optimality criterion may be the maximisation of the profit of the storage itself, where this profit results from the exploitation of the differences in market clearing prices at different times. Alternatively it may be the minimisation of the cost of generation, or the maximisation of consumer surplus or social welfare. In all cases there is calculated for each successive time-step the cost function measuring the total impact of whatever action is taken by the storage. The succession of such cost functions provides the information for the storage to determine how to behave over time, forming the basis of the appropriate optimisation problem. We study particularly competition between multiple stores, where the objective of each store is to maximise its own income given the activities of the remainder. We show that, at the Cournot Nash equilibrium, multiple stores which between them have market impact collectively erode their own abilities to make profits: essentially each store attempts to increase its own profit over time by overcompeting at the expense of the remainder. We quantify this for linear price functions. We give examples throughout based on electricity storage and Great Britain electricity spot-price market data. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:998 / 1012
页数:15
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Using supply functions for offering generation into an electricity market [J].
Anderson, EJ ;
Philpott, AB .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 50 (03) :477-489
[2]  
[Anonymous], INF SCI SYST CISS 20
[3]   SUPPLY FUNCTION EQUILIBRIA AND THE DANGER OF TACIT COLLUSION - THE CASE OF SPOT MARKETS FOR ELECTRICITY [J].
BOLLE, F .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 1992, 14 (02) :94-102
[4]   An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California's electricity industry [J].
Borenstein, S ;
Bushnell, J .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 47 (03) :285-323
[5]   A mixed complementarity model of hydrothermal electricity competition in the western United States [J].
Bushnell, J .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2003, 51 (01) :80-93
[6]  
Cruise J. R., 2015, OPTIMAL CONTROL STOR
[7]  
Denholm P., 2010, TECHNICAL REPORT
[8]  
First Hydro Company, 2017, DIN POW STAT
[9]   OPTIMAL STRATEGIES FOR OPERATING ENERGY STORAGE IN AN ARBITRAGE OR SMOOTHING MARKET [J].
Flatley, Lisa C. ;
MacKay, Robert S. ;
Waterson, Michael .
JOURNAL OF DYNAMICS AND GAMES, 2016, 3 (04) :371-398
[10]   Stochastic programming for optimizing bidding strategies of a Nordic hydropower producer [J].
Fleten, Stein-Erik ;
Kristoffersen, Trine Krogh .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (02) :916-928