Statewide Survey of Chemically Stabilized Soil Properties for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design

被引:4
|
作者
Carey, A. S. [1 ]
Cooley, L. A. Jr Jr [2 ]
Middleton, A. [3 ]
Sullivan, W. G. [4 ]
Ayers, L. E. W. [5 ]
Howard, I. L. [6 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Adv Vehicular Syst, Starkville, MS 39759 USA
[2] Burns Cooley Dennis Inc, Ridgeland, MS USA
[3] Mississippi Dept Transportat MDOT, Jackson, MS USA
[4] MDOT, Lansing, MI USA
[5] Appl Res Associates Inc, Egg Harbor Township, NJ USA
[6] MSU, Richard A Rula Sch Civil & Environm, Mississippi State, MS USA
关键词
cement stabilization; chemically stabilized soil; in-place properties; lime-fly ash stabilization; lime stabilization; mechanistic-empirical pavement design; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.14359/51735957
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Over 450 cores were extracted from roadways throughout Mississippi to provide a realistic picture of mechanical properties in later-age chemically stabilized soil. Cores ranged from 10 to 54 years old and were stabilized with either lime-fly ash, cement, or lime. Indirect tensile strength (IDT), unconfined compressive strength (UCS), and elastic modulus (E) tests were used to quantify mechanical properties. Generally speaking, IDT, UCS, and E values tended not to exceed 250, 1500, and 1,500,000 psi (1724 kPa, 10,342 kPa, and 10,342 MPa), respectively, in pavements over 10 years old. Cores were also compared to mechanical property relationships found in the 1993 AASHTO design guide and the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) and the literature to determine their applicability to later-age pavement properties. Relationships from the literature comparing IDT to UCS were generally good predictors of later-age property relationships; however, relationships between E and UCS were not good predictors of later-age strength as most equations did not account for the decrease in E development over time when compared to UCS.
引用
收藏
页码:226 / 237
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Backcasting and forecasting stabilized soil mechanical properties for mechanistic-empirical pavement design
    Carey, Ashley S.
    Howard, Isaac L.
    CONSTRUCTION AND BUILDING MATERIALS, 2022, 324
  • [2] Mechanistic-Empirical design of perpetual pavement
    Islam, Shuvo
    Sufian, Abu
    Hossain, Mustaque
    Miller, Richard
    Leibrock, Christopher
    ROAD MATERIALS AND PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2020, 21 (05) : 1224 - 1237
  • [3] Mechanistic-empirical flexible pavement design: an overview
    Thompson, M.R.
  • [4] The mechanistic-empirical pavement design: An Egyptian perspective
    Aguib, Ashraf Ayman
    Khedr, Safwan
    FUNCTIONAL PAVEMENT DESIGN, 2016, : 107 - 107
  • [5] Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design; A Brief Overview
    Papagiannakis, A. T.
    GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 44 (01): : 75 - 82
  • [6] Development of mechanistic-empirical pavement design in Minnesota
    Timm, D
    Birgisson, B
    Newcomb, D
    DESIGN AND REHABILITATION OF PAVEMENTS 1998, 1998, (1629): : 181 - 188
  • [7] Incorporation of reliability into mechanistic-empirical pavement design
    Timm, DH
    Newcomb, DE
    Galambos, TV
    ISSUES IN PAVEMENT DESIGN AND REHABILITATION: PAVEMENT DESIGN MANAGEMENT AND PERFORMANCE, 2000, (1730): : 73 - 80
  • [8] Mechanistic-empirical pavement design; A brief overview
    Papagiannakis, A.T. (at.papagiannakis@utsa.edu), 1600, Southeast Asian Geotechnical Society (44):
  • [9] Validation of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Approach for Flexible Pavement Design
    Jayarathna, K. A. R. N.
    Premarathne, R. P. P. K.
    Mampearachchi, W. K.
    MERCON 2020: 6TH INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY MORATUWA ENGINEERING RESEARCH CONFERENCE (MERCON), 2020, : 395 - 400
  • [10] Streamlining Use of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide
    Graves, R. Clark
    Mahboub, Kamyar C.
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2305) : 170 - 176