Own- and Other-Race Face Identity Recognition in Children: The Effects of Pose and Feature Composition

被引:31
作者
Anzures, Gizelle [1 ]
Kelly, David J. [2 ]
Pascalis, Olivier [3 ]
Quinn, Paul C. [4 ]
Slater, Alan M. [5 ]
de Vivies, Xavier [6 ]
Lee, Kang [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ London, Ctr Brain & Cognit Dev, Henry Wellcome Bldg,Malet St, London WC1E 7HX, England
[2] Univ Kent, Dept Psychol, Canterbury, Kent, England
[3] Univ Pierre Mendes France, Dept Psychol, Grenoble, France
[4] Univ Delaware, Dept Psychol, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[5] Univ Exeter, Dept Psychol, Exeter EX4 4RJ, Devon, England
[6] Univ Reunion, DIMPS, St Denis, Reunion, France
[7] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
关键词
face recognition; other-race effect; development of other-race effect; face pose; GAZE-DIRECTION; UNFAMILIAR FACES; EXTERNAL FEATURES; EYE REMEMBER; FAMILIAR; ADVANTAGE; INFANCY; MEMORY; INNER; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1037/a0033166
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We used a matching-to-sample task and manipulated facial pose and feature composition to examine the other-race effect (ORE) in face identity recognition between 5 and 10 years of age. Overall, the present findings provide a genuine measure of own-and other-race face identity recognition in children that is independent of photographic and image processing. The current study also confirms the presence of an ORE in children as young as 5 years of age using a recognition paradigm that is sensitive to their developing cognitive abilities. In addition, the present findings show that with age, increasing experience with familiar classes of own-race faces and further lack of experience with unfamiliar classes of other-race faces serves to maintain the ORE between 5 and 10 years of age rather than exacerbate the effect. All age groups also showed a differential effect of stimulus facial pose in their recognition of the internal regions of own-and other-race faces. Own-race inner faces were remembered best when three-quarter poses were used during familiarization and frontal poses were used during the recognition test. In contrast, other-race inner faces were remembered best when frontal poses were used during familiarization and three-quarter poses were used during the recognition test. Thus, children encode and/or retrieve own-and other-race faces from memory in qualitatively different ways.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 481
页数:13
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   Looking the other way: The role of gaze direction in the cross-race memory effect [J].
Adams, Reginald B., Jr. ;
Pauker, Kristin ;
Weisbuch, Max .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 46 (02) :478-481
[2]   Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants' representation of face race [J].
Anzures, Gizelle ;
Quinn, Paul C. ;
Pascalis, Olivier ;
Slater, Alan M. ;
Lee, Kang .
DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2010, 13 (04) :553-564
[3]  
Baddeley A.D., 1983, EVALUATING WITNESS E, P125
[4]   Nature and nurture in own-race face processing [J].
Bar-Haim, Y ;
Ziv, T ;
Lamy, D ;
Hodes, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2006, 17 (02) :159-163
[5]   7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: Evidence against a developmental shift [J].
Bonner, L ;
Burton, M .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 57 (06) :1019-1029
[6]   CROSS-RACIAL IDENTIFICATION [J].
BOTHWELL, RK ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
MALPASS, RS .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1989, 15 (01) :19-25
[8]   Interest and attention in facial recognition [J].
Burgess, MCR ;
Weaver, GE .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2003, 96 (02) :467-480
[9]   Event-related potentials and time course of the 'other-race' face classification advantage [J].
Caldara, R ;
Rossion, B ;
Bovet, P ;
Hauert, CA .
NEUROREPORT, 2004, 15 (05) :905-910
[10]   THE DEVELOPMENT OF DIFFERENTIAL USE OF INNER AND OUTER FACE FEATURES IN FAMILIAR FACE IDENTIFICATION [J].
CAMPBELL, R ;
WALKER, J ;
BARONCOHEN, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1995, 59 (02) :196-210