Technological innovation, financialization, and ecological footprint: evidence from BEM economies

被引:122
作者
Destek, Mehmet Akif [1 ]
Manga, Muge [2 ]
机构
[1] Gaziantep Univ, Dept Econ, Gaziantep, Turkey
[2] Erzincan Binali Yildirim Univ, Dept Econ, Erzincan, Turkey
关键词
Technological innovation; Financialization; Environmental degradation; Carbon emission; Ecological footprint; Panel data; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; CO2; EMISSIONS; CARBON EMISSIONS; GROWTH NEXUS; IMPACT; DEGRADATION; INCOME; GLOBALIZATION; INDUSTRIALIZATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-020-11845-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the growing interest in researches on the impact of technological development on carbon emissions, the effect of technological innovation on the other indicators of environmental degradation is of little interest. In order to close this gap, the aim of this study is to determine the effects of technological innovation on both carbon emission and ecological footprint for big emerging markets (BEM) countries. In doing so, the environmental impacts of the financialization process are also explored, in line with the fact that these countries face constraints in financing technological developments. In this context, the effects of technological development, financialization, renewable energy consumption, and non-renewable energy consumption on environmental degradation are examined through the second-generation panel data methods for the period 1995-2016. The findings indicate that technological innovation is effective in reducing carbon emissions, but does not have a significant impact on the ecological footprint, namely a 1% increase in technological innovations reduces carbon emission by 0.082-0.088%. Moreover, it is found that financialization harms environmental quality for both indicators of the environment because a 1% increase in financialization increases carbon emissions by 0.203-0.222% and increases ecological footprint by 0.069-0.071%.
引用
收藏
页码:21991 / 22001
页数:11
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]   Does financial development asymmetrically affect CO2 emissions in China? An application of the nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) model [J].
Ahmad, Manzoor ;
Khan, Zeeshan ;
Rahman, Zia Ur ;
Khan, Shehzad .
CARBON MANAGEMENT, 2018, 9 (06) :631-644
[2]   Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: Evidence from selected European countries [J].
Ahmed, Ali ;
Uddin, Gazi Salah ;
Sohag, Kazi .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2016, 90 :202-208
[3]   Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis [J].
Ahmed, Zahoor ;
Wang, Zhaohua .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (26) :26782-26796
[4]   Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia [J].
Ahmed, Zahoor ;
Wang, Zhaohua ;
Mahmood, Faisal ;
Hafeez, Muhammad ;
Ali, Nazakat .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2019, 26 (18) :18565-18582
[5]   The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emission on the economic growth and financial development in the Sub Saharan African countries [J].
Al-Mulali, Usama ;
Sab, Che Normee Binti Che .
ENERGY, 2012, 39 (01) :180-186
[6]   Financial development and carbon dioxide emissions in Nigeria: evidence from the ARDL bounds approach [J].
Ali, Hamisu Sadi ;
Law, Siong Hook ;
Lin, Woon Leong ;
Yusop, Zulkornain ;
Chin, Lee ;
Bare, Uweis Abdulahi Ali .
GEOJOURNAL, 2019, 84 (03) :641-655
[7]   Environmental degradation, economic growth, and energy innovation: evidence from European countries [J].
Ali, Muhammad ;
Raza, Syed Ali ;
Khamis, Bilal .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2020, 27 (22) :28306-28315
[8]  
Ali W., 2016, INT J ENERGY EC POLI, V6, P389
[9]   Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe [J].
Alola, Andrew Adewale ;
Bekun, Festus Victor ;
Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 685 :702-709
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2017