The scintigraphic anatomy of the equine sacroiliac joint

被引:19
|
作者
Erichsen, C
Berger, M
Eksell, P
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, SLU, Dept Clin Radiol, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Norwegian Sch Vet Sci, Dept Large Anim Clin Sci, N-0033 Oslo, Norway
关键词
scintigraphy; anatomy; equine; sacroiliac joint;
D O I
10.1111/j.1740-8261.2002.tb01005.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to describe the scintigraphic appearance and location of the sacroiliac joint (SI-joint) in dorsal and dorso 30degrees lateral views of the equine pelvis in a scintigram. The pelvis from 10 different horses was prepared by attaching plastic tubes along relevant margins of the bone and around the SI-joint. A radioactive solution was injected into the tubes, and scintigraphic images were acquired with a gamma camera. Five specific landmarks were identified on the left and right sides of the pelvis. There was no significant difference in the distance measurements between the left and right sides in the dorsal view. The SI-joint was roughly ovoid in shape, with its long axis angled to the midline. The most craniolateral point of the SI-joint (Y) was located at the middle (SD = 0.04) of a line drawn from the caudal margin of the tuber sacrale (TS) to the craniolateral margin of the tuber coxa (TC), which was called TS-TC. In 85% of the specimens, the long axis of the SI-joint (SILA) was located caudal to or intersecting TS-TC, and the mean angle between SILA and TS-TC was 16.4degrees (SD = 5.6degrees). The distance from the caudomedial point of the SI-joint (Z) to Y was 0.38 times (SD = 0.04) the length of TS-TC. The distance from the tuber sacrale to the medial border of the SI-joint (TS-X) was 0.15 times (SD = 0.02) the length of TS-TC. In the oblique view, the SI-joint appeared wider and was positioned more laterally compared to the dorsal view. The distance TS-Y increased to 0.61 times (SD = 0.046) TS-TC, but SILA/TS-TC was essentially unchanged. The mean angle between TS-TC and SILA increased to 20.9degrees (SD = 5.6degrees). TS-X increased to 0.31 times (SD = 0.037) TS-TC. The location of the SI-joint was very similar in all horses, which makes it possible to estimate the location of the SI-joint in a scintigram in which the tuber sacrale and the craniolateral margin of the tuber coxa are identified.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 292
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] SCINTIGRAPHIC AND RADIOGRAPHIC APPEARANCE OF THE SACROILIAC REGION IN HORSES WITH GAIT ABNORMALITIES OR POOR PERFORMANCE
    Gorgas, Daniela
    Luder, Patric
    Lang, Johann
    Doherr, Marcus G.
    Ueltschi, Gottlieb
    Kircher, Patrick
    VETERINARY RADIOLOGY & ULTRASOUND, 2009, 50 (02) : 208 - 214
  • [42] The sacroiliac joint and pain
    Schwarze, Martin
    Schenker, Astrid
    Schiltenwolf, Marcus
    Akbar, Michael
    SCHMERZ, 2020, 34 (04): : 357 - 368
  • [43] Radiology of the sacroiliac joint
    Ebraheim, NA
    Mekhail, AO
    Wiley, WF
    Jackson, WT
    Yeasting, RA
    SPINE, 1997, 22 (08) : 869 - 876
  • [44] Sacroiliac joint imaging
    Tuite, Michael J.
    SEMINARS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 12 (01) : 72 - 82
  • [45] Sacroiliac Joint Interventions
    Quijano, David A. Soto
    Loperena, Eduardo Otero
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 29 (01) : 171 - +
  • [46] Tuberculosis of the sacroiliac joint
    Vaiopoulos G.
    Sfikakis P.P.
    Velikas E.
    Kittas C.
    Kaklamanis P.
    European Spine Journal, 1997, 6 (5) : 330 - 331
  • [47] Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis
    R. J. S. Ramlakan
    S. Govender
    International Orthopaedics, 2007, 31 : 121 - 124
  • [48] Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
    Ilaslan, Hakan
    Arslan, Ahmet
    Koc, Omer Nadir
    Dalkilic, Turker
    Naderi, Salt
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 20 (03) : 398 - 401
  • [49] Sacroiliac Joint Interventions
    Yang, Aaron J.
    Schneider, Byron J.
    Miller, Scott
    PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2022, 33 (02) : 251 - 265
  • [50] Sacroiliac Joint Injections
    Kumar, Naresh
    Tan, Barry W. L.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 28 (01) : 50 - 54