Operation versus antibiotics-The "appendicitis conundrum" continues: A meta-analysis

被引:29
作者
Sakran, Joseph V. [1 ]
Mylonas, Konstantinos S. [2 ,3 ]
Gryparis, Alexandros [4 ,5 ]
Stawicki, Stanislaw P. [6 ]
Burns, Christopher J. [7 ]
Matar, Maher M. [8 ]
Economopoulos, Konstantinos P. [2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Soc Jr Doctors, Surg Working Grp, Athens, Greece
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Div Pediat Surg, Dept Surg, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[4] Prolepsis, Inst Prevent Med Environm & Occupat Hlth, Athens, Greece
[5] Natl & Kapodistrian Univ Athens, Dept Hyg Epidemiol & Med Stat, Med Sch, Athens, Greece
[6] St Lukes Univ Hlth Network, Dept Res & Innovat, Bethlehem, PA USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Surg, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA USA
[8] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Surg, Charleston, SC USA
[9] Harvard Med Sch, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Surg, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Antibiotics; appendicitis; meta-analysis; nonoperative management; surgery; UNCOMPLICATED ACUTE APPENDICITIS; CLINICAL-TRIAL; APPENDECTOMY; THERAPY; MANAGEMENT; DISEASE; SAFETY; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0000000000001450
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis continues to constitute a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to synthesize evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing nonoperative versus surgical management of uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adult patients. METHODS: A systematic literature search of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases was performed with respect to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) statement (end-of-search date: January 29, 2017). Data on the study design, interventions, participants, and outcomes were extracted by two independent reviewers. The random-effects model (DerSimonian-Laird) was used to calculate pooled effect estimates when substantial heterogeneity was encountered; otherwise, the fixed-effects (Mantel-Haenszel) model was implemented. Quality assessment of included RCTs was performed using the modified Jadad scale. RESULTS: Five RCTs were included in this review. Overall, 1,430 adult patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis underwent either nonoperative (n = 727) or operative management (n = 703). Treatment efficacy at 1-year follow-up was significantly lower (63.8%) for antibiotics compared with the surgery group (93%) (risk ratio [RR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.77; p < 0.001). Overall complications were significantly higher in the surgery group (166/703 [23.6%]) compared with the antibiotics group (56/727 [7.7%]) (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.24-0.43; p < 0.001). No difference was found between the two treatment modalities in terms of perforated appendicitis rates (RR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.14-1.92), length of hospital stay (weighted mean difference [WMD], 0.20; 95% CI, -0.16 to 0.56), duration of pain (WMD, 0.22; 95% CI, -5.30 to -5.73), and sick leave (WMD, -2; 95% CI, -5.2 to 1.1). CONCLUSIONS: Conservative management of uncomplicated appendicitis in adults warrants further study. Addressing patients' expectations via a shared decision-making process is a crucial step in optimizing nonoperative outcomes. Copyright (C) 2017 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1129 / 1137
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Examining a Common Disease with Unknown Etiology: Trends in Epidemiology and Surgical Management of Appendicitis in California, 1995-2009 [J].
Anderson, Jamie E. ;
Bickler, Stephen W. ;
Chang, David C. ;
Talamini, Mark A. .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (12) :2787-2794
[2]  
[Anonymous], CDC NEWS ROOM
[3]   Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis [J].
Atema, J. J. ;
van Rossem, C. C. ;
Leeuwenburgh, M. M. ;
Stoker, J. ;
Boermeester, M. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 102 (08) :979-990
[4]   Negative Appendectomy and Imaging Accuracy in the Washington State Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program [J].
Cuschieri, Joseph ;
Florence, Michael ;
Flum, David R. ;
Jurkovich, Gregory J. ;
Lin, Paul ;
Steele, Scott R. ;
Symons, Rebecca Gaston ;
Thirlby, Richard .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2008, 248 (04) :557-562
[5]  
Debnath Jyotindu, 2016, Med J Armed Forces India, V72, P285, DOI 10.1016/j.mjafi.2015.01.017
[6]   Neuroimmune appendicitis [J].
Di Sebastiano, P ;
Fink, T ;
di Mola, FF ;
Weihe, E ;
Innocenti, P ;
Friess, H ;
Büchler, MW .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9177) :461-466
[7]   Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test [J].
Egger, M ;
Smith, GD ;
Schneider, M ;
Minder, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7109) :629-634
[8]   Engaging Stakeholders in Surgical Research: The Design of a Pragmatic Clinical Trial to Study Management of Acute Appendicitis [J].
Ehlers, Anne P. ;
Davidson, Giana H. ;
Bizzell, Bonnie J. ;
Guiden, Mary K. ;
Skopin, Elliott ;
Flum, David R. ;
Lavallee, Danielle C. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2016, 151 (06) :580-582
[9]   Evidence for an Antibiotics-First Strategy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Gap Analysis [J].
Ehlers, Anne P. ;
Talan, David A. ;
Moran, Gregory J. ;
Flum, David R. ;
Davidson, Giana H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2016, 222 (03) :309-314
[10]   RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF APPENDECTOMY VERSUS ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY FOR ACUTE APPENDICITIS [J].
ERIKSSON, S ;
GRANSTROM, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1995, 82 (02) :166-169