A preposterior analysis to predict identifiability in the experimental calibration of computer models

被引:32
作者
Arendt, Paul D. [1 ]
Apley, Daniel W. [2 ]
Chen, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Management Sci, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Gaussian process models; Kriging; Bayesian calibration; computer experiments; DESIGN; SIMULATIONS;
D O I
10.1080/0740817X.2015.1064554
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
When using physical experimental data to adjust, or calibrate, computer simulation models, two general sources of uncertainty that must be accounted for are calibration parameter uncertainty and model discrepancy. This is complicated by the well-known fact that systems to be calibrated are often subject to identifiability problems, in the sense that it is difficult to precisely estimate the parameters and to distinguish between the effects of parameter uncertainty and model discrepancy. We develop a form of preposterior analysis that can be used, prior to conducting physical experiments but after conducting the computer simulations, to predict the degree of identifiability that will result after conducting the physical experiments for a given experimental design. Specifically, we calculate the preposterior covariance matrix of the calibration parameters and demonstrate that, in the examples that we consider, it provides a reasonable prediction of the actual posterior covariance that is calculated after the experimental data are collected. Consequently, the preposterior covariance can be used as a criterion for designing physical experiments to help achieve better identifiability in calibration problems.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 88
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Evaluation of Gaussian Processes and other Methods for Non-Linear Regression
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003010148 SAE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, TECHNICAL REPORT
[4]   Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability [J].
Arendt, Paul D. ;
Apley, Daniel W. ;
Chen, Wei .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (10)
[5]   A framework for validation of computer models [J].
Bayarri, Maria J. ;
Berger, James O. ;
Paulo, Rui ;
Sacks, Jerry ;
Cafeo, John A. ;
Cavendish, James ;
Lin, Chin-Hsu ;
Tu, Jian .
TECHNOMETRICS, 2007, 49 (02) :138-154
[6]  
Berger JO., 2013, Statistical decision theory and Bayesian analysis
[7]   Empirical Bayes: Past, present and future [J].
Carlin, BP ;
Louis, TA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (452) :1286-1289
[8]  
Cressie NAC., 1993, STAT SPATIAL DATA, DOI [10.1002/9781119115151, DOI 10.1002/9781119115151]
[9]   A Kriging Approach to the Analysis of Climate Model Experiments [J].
Drignei, Dorin .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL BIOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL STATISTICS, 2009, 14 (01) :99-114
[10]  
Hamada M, 2000, Experiments: Planning, Analysis, and Optimization