Principles guiding ethical research in a collaboration to strengthen Indigenous primary healthcare in Australia: learning from experience

被引:13
作者
Bailie, Jodie [1 ,2 ]
Laycock, Alison Frances [1 ]
Conte, Kathleen Parker [1 ,3 ]
Matthews, Veronica [1 ]
Peiris, David [2 ,4 ]
Bailie, Ross Stewart [1 ]
Abimbola, Seye [2 ,4 ]
Passey, Megan Elizabeth [1 ]
Cunningham, Frances Clare [5 ]
Harkin, Kerryn [1 ]
Bainbridge, Roxanne Gwendalyn [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Univ Ctr Rural Hlth, Lismore, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Sch Publ Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] DePaul Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Univ New South Wales, George Inst Global Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[5] Charles Darwin Univ, Menzies Sch Hlth Res, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Cent Queensland Univ, Ctr Indigenous Hlth Equ Res, Cairns, Qld, Australia
来源
BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 6卷 / 01期
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
health services research; health systems; health systems evaluation; health policy; qualitative study;
D O I
10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003852
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction Indigenous communities worldwide are leading calls for all research involving Indigenous people to be underpinned by values and principles articulated by them. Many researchers are explicitly adopting these principles to guide what, where, how and when research is undertaken with Indigenous people. With critical reflection to support the implementation of such principles largely absent from published literature, this paper explores both the implementation of, and the outcomes from a set of guiding principles used in a large-scale Australian research collaboration to improve Indigenous health. Methods In this inductive qualitative study, we adopted a principles-focused evaluation approach. Based on interviews with 35 actors in the collaboration and a review of project documents, we generated themes that were then iteratively discussed, refined and categorised into (1) 'strategies'-activities by which implementation of our guiding principles were recognised; (2) 'outcomes'-results seen from implementing the principles and (3) 'conditions'-aspects of the context that facilitated and constrained implementation of the principles. Results Respondents found it difficult to articulate how the guiding principles were actually implemented, and frequently referred to them as part of the fabric of the collaboration. They viewed the set of principles as mutually reinforcing, and as providing a rudder for navigating complexity and conflict. Implementation of the principles occurred through five strategies-honouring the principles; being dynamic and adaptable; sharing and dispersing leadership; collaborating purposefully and adopting a culture of mutual learning. Outcomes included increased Indigenous leadership and participation; the ability to attract principled and values-driven researchers and stakeholders, and the development of trusting and respectful relationships. The conditions that facilitated the implementation of the principles were collaborating over time; an increasing number of Indigenous researchers and taking an 'innovation platform' approach. Conclusion Our findings show that principles guiding collaborations are valuable in providing a focus, direction and a way of working together when they are collaboratively developed, hold genuine meaning for all members and are implemented within a culture of continuous critical reflection, learning and adaptation, with ongoing reinterpretation of the principles over time.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health
    Abimbola, Seye
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (05):
  • [2] Anderson A, 2018, QUALITATIVE REPORT, V23
  • [3] Andrews Matt., 2017, Building State Capability: Evidence, Analysis, Action, P29, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780198747482.003.0003
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2018, Ethical conduct in research with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples and communities: Guidelines for researchers and stakeholders
  • [5] Tacit knowledge as a multilayer phenomenon: the "onion" model
    Asher, Dan
    Popper, Micha
    [J]. LEARNING ORGANIZATION, 2019, 26 (03) : 264 - 275
  • [6] Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies & The Lowitja Institute, 2013, EV NAT HLTH MED RES
  • [7] Bailie J, 2020, COLLABORATION KNOWLE
  • [8] Bailie J, 2018, YEAR 4 REV PROGR REP
  • [9] Using developmental evaluation to enhance continuous reflection, learning and adaptation of an innovation platform in Australian Indigenous primary healthcare
    Bailie, Jodie
    Laycock, Alison Frances
    Peiris, David
    Bainbridge, Roxanne Gwendalyn
    Matthews, Veronica
    Cunningham, Frances Clare
    Conte, Kathleen Parker
    Abimbola, Seye
    Passey, Megan Elizabeth
    Bailie, Ross Stewart
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [10] Comparing and contrasting 'innovation platforms' with other forms of professional networks for strengthening primary healthcare systems for Indigenous Australians
    Bailie, Jodie
    Cunningham, Frances Clare
    Bainbridge, Roxanne Gwendalyn
    Passey, Megan E.
    Laycock, Alison Frances
    Bailie, Ross Stewart
    Larkins, Sarah L.
    Brands, Jenny S. M.
    Ramanathan, Shanthi
    Abimbola, Seye
    Peiris, David
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2018, 3 (03):