Association of Preterm Births Among US Latina Women With the 2016 Presidential Election

被引:118
|
作者
Gemmill, Alison [1 ,2 ]
Catalano, Ralph [3 ]
Casey, Joan A. [3 ]
Karasek, Deborah [4 ]
Alcala, Hector E. [2 ]
Elser, Holly [3 ]
Torres, Jacqueline M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Populat Family & Reprod Hlth, 615 N Wolfe St,Room E4148, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] SUNY Stony Brook, Dept Family Populat & Prevent Med, Program Publ Hlth, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Publ Hlth, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Preterm Birth Initiat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
关键词
FETAL SEX; HEALTH; STRESS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; DEPORTATION; FEAR;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.7084
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE The circumstances surrounding the 2016 US presidential election have been proposed as a significant stressor in the lives of the US Latino population. Few studies to date, however, have evaluated the population health implications of the election for Latina mothers and their children. OBJECTIVE To determine whether preterm births (gestational age, <37 weeks) among US Latina women increased above expected levels after the 2016 US presidential election. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this national population-based study, an interrupted time series design, used to evaluate whether policies or other population-level changes interrupt a trend in an outcome, compared monthly counts of preterm births to Latina women after the 2016 presidential election with the number expected had the election not taken place. Women residing in the United States who had singleton births during the study period were included. Counts of singleton term and preterm births by month and race/ethnicity from January 1, 2009, through July 30, 2017 (32 860 727 live births), were obtained from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wonder online database. These methods were applied separately to male and female births. Data were analyzed from November 8, 2018, through May 7, 2019. EXPOSURES Pregnancy in he 2016 US presidential election. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The number of male and female preterm births based on the last menstrual period. RESULTS Among the 32 8 60 727 live births recorded during the study period, 11.0% of male and 9.6% of female births to Latina women were preterm compared with 10.2% and 9.3%, respectively, to other women. In the 9-month period beginning with November 2016, an additional 1342 male (95% CI, 795-1889) and 995 female (95% CI, 554-1436) preterm births to Latina women were found above the expected number of preterm births had the election not occurred. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The 2016 US presidential election appears to have been associated with an increase in preterm births among US Latina women. Anti-immigration policies have been proposed and enforced in the aftermath of the 2016 presidential election; future research should evaluate the association of these actions with population health.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The 2016 presidential election and periviable births among Latina women
    Gemmill, Alison
    Catalano, Ralph
    Alcala, Hector
    Karasek, Deborah
    Casey, Joan A.
    Bruckner, Tim A.
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2020, 151
  • [2] The Influence of County Contexts on Preterm Births Among Latina Mothers in the US
    Nwankwo, Ezinne
    Sudhinaraset, May
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2025,
  • [3] Obesity Prevalence and Voting Behaviors in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    An, Ruopeng
    Ji, Mengmeng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR, 2018, 42 (05): : 21 - 31
  • [4] Young adults' psychological and physiological reactions to the 2016 US presidential election
    Hoyt, Lindsay T.
    Zeiders, Katharine H.
    Chaku, Natasha
    Toomey, Russell B.
    Nair, Rajni L.
    PSYCHONEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2018, 92 : 162 - 169
  • [5] The association between the end of court-ordered school desegregation and preterm births among Black women
    Shen, Menghan
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (08):
  • [6] Diverging Life Expectancies and Voting Patterns in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Bor, Jacob
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2017, 107 (10) : 1560 - 1562
  • [7] Societal Majority, Facebook, and the Spiral of Silence in the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Kushin, Matthew J.
    Yamamoto, Masahiro
    Dalisay, Francis
    SOCIAL MEDIA + SOCIETY, 2019, 5 (02):
  • [8] Changes in Subjective Well-Being Following the US Presidential Election of 2016
    Lench, Heather C.
    Levine, Linda J.
    Perez, Kenneth A.
    Carpenter, Zari Koelbel
    Carlson, Steven J.
    Tibbett, Tom
    EMOTION, 2019, 19 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [9] Emotional reactivity changes to daily stressors surrounding the 2016 US presidential election
    Neupert, Shevaun D.
    Bellingtier, Jennifer A.
    Smith, Emily L.
    CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 40 (06) : 2832 - 2842
  • [10] Arrhythmia Risk During the 2016 US Presidential Election: The Cost of Stressful Politics
    Rosman, Lindsey
    Salmoirago-Blotcher, Elena
    Mahmood, Rafat
    Yang, Hannan
    Li, Quefeng
    Mazzella, Anthony J.
    Lawrence Klein, Jeffrey
    Bumgarner, Joseph
    Gehi, Anil
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2021, 10 (11):