Evaluating Embolic Reduction Techniques Concurrent to Infrainguinal Interventions: A Single-Center Experience

被引:0
作者
Makam, Prakash [1 ]
机构
[1] Community Hlth Care Syst, Munster, IN USA
关键词
lower limbs; Proteus; embolic protection devices; peripheral; distal embolization; atherectomy; SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL-ARTERY; DISTAL EMBOLIZATION; PERCUTANEOUS INTERVENTIONS; CAPTURE ANGIOPLASTY; PROTECTION; REGISTRY; COMPLICATIONS; ATHERECTOMY; DISEASE; BALLOON;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To report a single-center retrospective evaluation of embolic reduction strategies concurrent to infrainguinal atherectomy intervention. Methods. Fifty-five consecutive atherectomy patients from 2011 to 2012 treated with embolic reduction devices were analyzed. Embolic load was stratified by lesion type, atherectomy technique, debris capture effectiveness, and risk factor characteristics. Over 80% of lesions were complex. Baseline stenosis and average lesion length were 94.2 +/- 6.4% and 172.8 +/- 85.5 mm, respectively. Our embolic reduction strategy included a systematic approach using the Proteus device in all cases and then in combination with the SpiderFX for long or complex lesions. Debris was analyzed for count and aggregate surface area. Results. Procedural success was 98.2%, with no in-hospital serious adverse events. The mean aggregated surface area of captured debris was 22 +/- 20 mm(2). Thrombolysis with laser produced the highest amount of embolic load followed by laser, directional, and orbital atherectomy procedures (P<.05). Patients with restenotic/in-stent restenotic lesions produced larger amounts of debris (P<.05). No embolizations were recorded up to discharge. Proteus accounted for two-thirds of the debris captured in our study; its capture efficiency increased as device and lesion length met. An inverse relation was also found between lesion length and embolic protection device capture efficacy (TASC-II B vs D; P<.02). Conclusion. An embolic reduction strategy using the Proteus catheter alone, particularly when Proteus and lesion lengths meet, or with the SpiderFX in complex infrainguinal atherectomy procedures, can be an effective tool. Current findings suggest potential optimization of future "at risk" interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 282
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Detection of distal emboli in patients with peripheral arterial stenosis before and after iliac angioplasty: A prospective study [J].
Al-Hamali, S ;
Baskerville, P ;
Fraser, S ;
Walters, H ;
Markus, HS .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 29 (02) :345-351
[2]  
Axisa B, 2002, ANN ROY COLL SURG, V84, P39
[3]   NONCORONARY ANGIOPLASTY [J].
BECKER, GJ ;
KATZEN, BT ;
DAKE, MD .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :921-940
[4]  
Chalmers R T, 1995, Cardiovasc Surg, V3, P293, DOI 10.1016/0967-2109(95)93879-T
[5]   Implications of In Situ Thrombosis and Distal Embolization during Superficial Femoral Artery Endoluminal Intervention [J].
Davies, Mark G. ;
Bismuth, Jean ;
Saad, Wael E. ;
Naoum, Joseph J. ;
Mohiuddin, Imran T. ;
Peden, Eric K. ;
Lumsden, Alan B. .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 24 (01) :14-22
[6]   Embolic Capture Angioplasty in Peripheral Artery Interventions [J].
Hadidi, Omar F. ;
Mohammad, Atif ;
Zankar, Ahmad ;
Brilakis, Emmanouil S. ;
Banerjee, Subhash .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2012, 19 (05) :611-616
[7]  
Kaid KA, 2009, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V21, P7
[8]   Distal embolism during percutaneous revascularization of infra-aortic arterial occlusive disease: An underestimated phenomenon [J].
Karnabatidis, Dimitris ;
Katsanos, Konstantinos ;
Kagadis, George C. ;
Ravazoula, Panagiota ;
Diamantopoulos, Athanasios ;
Nikiforidis, George C. ;
Siablis, Dirnitris .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2006, 13 (03) :269-280
[9]   Incidence and clinical significance of distal embolization during percutaneous interventions involving the superficial femoral artery [J].
Lam, Russell C. ;
Shah, Syed ;
Faries, Peter L. ;
McKinsey, James F. ;
Kent, K. Craig ;
Morrissey, Nicholas J. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 46 (06) :1155-1159
[10]  
Makam P, 2013, J INVASIVE CARDIOL, V25, pE63