Attraction to attachment insecurity: Flattery, appearance, and status's role in mate preferences

被引:8
作者
Brumbaugh, Claudia Chloe [1 ]
Baren, Alison [1 ]
Agishtein, Peryl [1 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Queens Coll, Dept Psychol, Queens, NY 11367 USA
关键词
SEX-DIFFERENCES; ADULT ATTACHMENT; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; INTIMATE-RELATIONSHIPS; WORKING MODELS; INTERPERSONAL-ATTRACTION; SELF-PRESENTATION; SUPPORT SEEKING; 37; CULTURES;
D O I
10.1111/pere.12032
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Research has shown that people select securely attached individuals as their first choice when asked to choose among secure or insecure partner prototypes. Despite this pattern, not everyone chooses a secure partner in real life. The goal of the reported studies was to examine factors that lead people to select insecure mates. Specifically, the roles of flattery, appearance, and status were assessed. In the first study, we found that flattery increased attraction to insecure partners. Study 2 showed that men preferred physical beauty over security. In Study 3, anxious women were attracted to high-status insecure men. These findings help explain why people may sometimes end up with insecure partners despite their professed preference for secure companions.
引用
收藏
页码:288 / 308
页数:21
相关论文
共 97 条
[11]   Adult attachment and sexual behavior [J].
Bogaert, AF ;
Sadava, S .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2002, 9 (02) :191-204
[12]   Personality and mate preferences: Five factors in mate selection and marital satisfaction [J].
Botwin, MD ;
Buss, DM ;
Shackelford, TK .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1997, 65 (01) :107-136
[13]   Adult attachment and dating strategies: How do insecure people attract mates? [J].
Brumbaugh, Claudia Chloe ;
Fraley, R. Chris .
PERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS, 2010, 17 (04) :599-614
[14]  
Buss D.M., 2006, PSIHOLOGIJSKE TEME, V15, P239
[16]   INTERNATIONAL PREFERENCES IN SELECTING MATES - A STUDY OF 37 CULTURES [J].
BUSS, DM ;
ABBOTT, M ;
ANGLEITNER, A ;
ASHERIAN, A ;
BIAGGIO, A ;
BLANCOVILLASENOR, A ;
BRUCHONSCHWEITZER, M ;
CHU, HY ;
CZAPINSKI, J ;
DERAAD, B ;
EKEHAMMAR, B ;
ELLOHAMY, N ;
FIORAVANTI, M ;
GEORGAS, J ;
GJERDE, P ;
GUTTMAN, R ;
HAZAN, F ;
IWAWAKI, S ;
JANAKIRAMAIAH, N ;
KHOSROSHANI, F ;
KREITLER, S ;
LACHENICHT, L ;
LEE, M ;
LIIK, K ;
LITTLE, B ;
MIKA, S ;
MOADELSHAHID, M ;
MOANE, G ;
MONTERO, M ;
MUNDYCASTLE, AC ;
NIIT, T ;
NSENDULUKA, E ;
PIENKOWSKI, R ;
PIRTTILABACKMAN, AM ;
DELEON, JP ;
ROUSSEAU, J ;
RUNCO, MA ;
SAFIR, MP ;
SAMUELS, C ;
SANITIOSO, R ;
SERPELL, R ;
SMID, N ;
SPENCER, C ;
TADINAC, M ;
TODOROVA, EN ;
TROLAND, K ;
VANDENBRANDE, L ;
VANHECK, G ;
VANLANGENHOVE, L ;
YANG, KS .
JOURNAL OF CROSS-CULTURAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 21 (01) :5-47
[17]   SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON HUMAN MATING [J].
BUSS, DM ;
SCHMITT, DP .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (02) :204-232
[18]   PREFERENCES IN HUMAN MATE SELECTION [J].
BUSS, DM ;
BARNES, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (03) :559-570
[19]   A half century of mate preferences: The cultural evolution of values [J].
Buss, DM ;
Shackelford, TK ;
Kirkpatrick, LA ;
Larsen, RJ .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND FAMILY, 2001, 63 (02) :491-503
[20]  
CHAPDELAINE A, 1994, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V67, P83