A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence

被引:22
作者
Jiao, Binbin [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Shicong [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Diao, Tongxiang [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Guan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, China Japan Friendship Sch Clin Med, Chaoyang, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Urol, Chaoyang, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Clin Med 5, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
MiniArc; single-incision mini-sling; stress urinary incontinence; TOT; transobturator midurethral slings; TVT-O; FREE VAGINAL TAPE; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE PROCEDURE; FOLLOW-UP; MIDURETHRAL SLINGS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; QUALITY; MONARC; WOMEN; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000010283
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:To assess the current evidence of effectiveness and safety of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator midurethral slings in the management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).Methods:A systematic search was performed from the electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library by November 2017. Using RevMan5.3 statistical software, the primary outcomes including subject and objective cure rates at 6 to 24 months follow-up were evaluated. Meanwhile, analysis was also performed for comparing the secondary outcomes such as peri- and postoperative complications, operative data, and quality of life.Results:Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6 retrospective cohort studies involving 1794 patients with SUI were analyzed based on the inclusion criteria. On the basis of our analysis, MiniArc was proven to have a noninferior clinical efficacy compared with transobturator midurethral slings with respect to the objective cure rate (risk ratio [RR]=0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.03, P=.43) and subjective cure rate (RR=0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1. 04, P=.38). In addition, pooled analysis showed that MiniArc had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (mean difference [MD]=-1.70, 95% CI -3.17 to -0.23, P=.02) and less postoperative groin pain (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98, P=.04). Moreover, the MiniArc group also had a significantly shorter operation time (MD=-6.12, 95% CI -8.61 to -3.64, P<.001), less blood loss (MD=-16.67, 95% CI -26.29 to -7.05, P<.001), shorter in-patient stay (MD=1.30, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.86, P<.001), and less urinary retention risk (RR=1.15, 95% CI 0.46-2.87, P=.77). However, overall evidence was insufficient to suggest a statistically significant difference in the adverse event profile for MiniArc compared with transobturator slings.Conclusions:This meta-analysis indicates that MiniArc is an effective method treating SUI. When compared with transobturator slings, it not only has a similar high cure rates, but also is associated with shorter operation time, less blood loss, more favorable recovery time, lower postoperative pain scores, less postoperative groin pain, less urinary retention, and absence of a visible wound. However, the findings of this study should be further confirmed by well-designed prospective RCTs with a larger patient series.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]  
Hay-Smith J, 2012, EUR J PHYS REHAB MED, V48, P689
[22]   Anatomical variability in the trajectory of the inside-out transobturator vaginal tape technique (TVT-O) [J].
Hinoul, Piet ;
Vanormelingen, Linda ;
Roovers, Jan-Paul ;
de Jonge, Eric ;
Smajda, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2007, 18 (10) :1201-1206
[23]   The MiniArc sling for female stress urinary incontinence: clinical results after 1-year follow-up [J].
Hogewoning, C. R. C. ;
Ruhe, I. M. C. ;
Bekker, M. D. ;
Hogewoning, C. J. A. ;
Putter, H. ;
DeRuiter, M. C. ;
Pelger, R. C. M. ;
Elzevier, H. W. .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (05) :589-595
[24]   Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample [J].
Hozo S.P. ;
Djulbegovic B. ;
Hozo I. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 5 (1)
[25]   Miniarc® single-incision sling for treatment of stress urinary incontinence: 2-year clinical outcomes [J].
Kennelly, Michael J. ;
Moore, Robert ;
Nguyen, John N. ;
Lukban, James ;
Siegel, Steven .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2012, 23 (09) :1285-1291
[26]   Prospective Evaluation of a Single Incision Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence [J].
Kennelly, Michael J. ;
Moore, Robert ;
Nguyen, John N. ;
Lukban, James C. ;
Siege, Steven .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (02) :604-609
[27]  
Kocjancic E, 2012, INT UROGYNECOL J, V23, pS114
[28]   Randomized trial of a single incision versus an outside-in transobturator midurethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 12 month results [J].
Lee, Joseph K. -S. ;
Rosamilia, Anna ;
Dwyer, Peter L. ;
Lim, Yik N. ;
Muller, Reinhold .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 213 (01)
[29]   THREE-YEAR FOLLOW-UP RESULTS OF TVT-SECUR® OPERATION FOR MANAGEMENT OF FEMALE STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE [J].
Lee, Sin Woo ;
Cho, Won Jin ;
Lee, Ha Na ;
Lee, Kyu-sung .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (04) :E213-E213
[30]  
Levi A, 2016, INT BRAZ J UROL, V42, P1195, DOI [10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0655, 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2015.0655]