A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator mid-urethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence

被引:22
作者
Jiao, Binbin [1 ,2 ]
Lai, Shicong [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Xin [1 ]
Zhang, Meng [1 ,2 ]
Diao, Tongxiang [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Guan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, China Japan Friendship Sch Clin Med, Chaoyang, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Urol, Chaoyang, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ, Sch Clin Med 5, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Beijing Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
MiniArc; single-incision mini-sling; stress urinary incontinence; TOT; transobturator midurethral slings; TVT-O; FREE VAGINAL TAPE; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE PROCEDURE; FOLLOW-UP; MIDURETHRAL SLINGS; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; QUALITY; MONARC; WOMEN; TRIALS;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000010283
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background:To assess the current evidence of effectiveness and safety of single-incision mini-slings (MiniArc) versus transobturator midurethral slings in the management of female stress urinary incontinence (SUI).Methods:A systematic search was performed from the electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library by November 2017. Using RevMan5.3 statistical software, the primary outcomes including subject and objective cure rates at 6 to 24 months follow-up were evaluated. Meanwhile, analysis was also performed for comparing the secondary outcomes such as peri- and postoperative complications, operative data, and quality of life.Results:Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 6 retrospective cohort studies involving 1794 patients with SUI were analyzed based on the inclusion criteria. On the basis of our analysis, MiniArc was proven to have a noninferior clinical efficacy compared with transobturator midurethral slings with respect to the objective cure rate (risk ratio [RR]=0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.94-1.03, P=.43) and subjective cure rate (RR=0.97, 95% CI 0.91-1. 04, P=.38). In addition, pooled analysis showed that MiniArc had significantly lower postoperative pain scores (mean difference [MD]=-1.70, 95% CI -3.17 to -0.23, P=.02) and less postoperative groin pain (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98, P=.04). Moreover, the MiniArc group also had a significantly shorter operation time (MD=-6.12, 95% CI -8.61 to -3.64, P<.001), less blood loss (MD=-16.67, 95% CI -26.29 to -7.05, P<.001), shorter in-patient stay (MD=1.30, 95% CI -1.74 to -0.86, P<.001), and less urinary retention risk (RR=1.15, 95% CI 0.46-2.87, P=.77). However, overall evidence was insufficient to suggest a statistically significant difference in the adverse event profile for MiniArc compared with transobturator slings.Conclusions:This meta-analysis indicates that MiniArc is an effective method treating SUI. When compared with transobturator slings, it not only has a similar high cure rates, but also is associated with shorter operation time, less blood loss, more favorable recovery time, lower postoperative pain scores, less postoperative groin pain, less urinary retention, and absence of a visible wound. However, the findings of this study should be further confirmed by well-designed prospective RCTs with a larger patient series.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Single incision mini-sling versus a transobutaror sling: a comparative study on MiniArc™ and Monarc™ slings [J].
De Ridder, Dirk ;
Berkers, Joost ;
Deprest, Jan ;
Verguts, Jasper ;
Ost, Dieter ;
Hamid, David ;
Van der Aa, Frank .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 21 (07) :773-778
[12]   TransobturatorTape (Uratape®o):: A new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence [J].
Delorme, E ;
Droupy, S ;
de Tayrac, R ;
Delmas, V .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (02) :203-207
[13]  
Delorme E, 2001, PROG UROL, V11, P1306
[14]   Presentation and management of major complications of midurethral slings: Are complications under-reported? [J].
Deng, Donna Y. ;
Rutman, Matthew ;
Raz, Shlomo ;
Rodriguez, Larissa V. .
NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2007, 26 (01) :46-52
[15]   MiniArc® versus Monarc® - a Prospective Randomized Study of the Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence with a Follow-up of 2 Years [J].
Enzelsberger, H. ;
Cemer, I. ;
Enzelsberger, S. ;
Schalupny, J. .
GEBURTSHILFE UND FRAUENHEILKUNDE, 2010, 70 (06) :499-502
[16]   Incontinence-specific quality of life measures used in trials of sling procedures for female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis [J].
Fan, Yijun ;
Huang, Zhaohui ;
Yu, Dexin .
INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2015, 47 (08) :1277-1295
[17]   Randomized prospective study comparing Monarc and Miniarc suburethral slings [J].
Foote, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2015, 41 (01) :127-131
[18]   Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Comparative Data on Colposuspensions, Pubovaginal Slings, and Midurethral Tapes in the Surgical Treatment of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence [J].
Fusco, Ferdinando ;
Abdel-Fattah, Mohamed ;
Chapple, Christopher R. ;
Creta, Massimiliano ;
La Falce, Sabrina ;
Waltregny, David ;
Novara, Giacomo .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 72 (04) :567-591
[19]  
Glazener CM, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V7, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD003881.PUB4
[20]  
Glazener CM, 2017, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, V7