Using species distribution models to predict new occurrences for rare plants

被引:328
作者
Williams, John N. [1 ]
Seo, Changwan [2 ]
Thorne, James [3 ]
Nelson, Julie K. [4 ]
Erwin, Susan [4 ]
O'Brien, Joshua M. [5 ]
Schwartz, Mark W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Environm Sci & Policy, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Seoul, Seoul 130743, South Korea
[3] Univ Calif Davis, Environm Informat Ctr, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[4] US Forest Serv, Redding, CA 96002 USA
[5] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Vet Med & Epidemiol, Ctr Anim Dis Modeling & Surveillance, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Edaphic specialist; endemism; Maxent; random forests; rarity; serpentine; PRESENCE-ONLY DATA; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SAMPLE-SIZE; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTIONS; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; RANDOM FORESTS; HABITAT; CLASSIFICATION; SENSITIVITY; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-4642.2009.00567.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Aim To evaluate a suite of species distribution models for their utility as predictors of suitable habitat and as tools for new population discovery of six rare plant species that have both narrow geographical ranges and specialized habitat requirements. Location The Rattlesnake Creek Terrane (RCT) of the Shasta-Trinity National Forest in the northern California Coast Range of the United States. Methods We used occurrence records from 25 years of US Forest Service botanical surveys, environmental and remotely sensed climate data to model the distributions of the target species across the RCT. The models included generalized linear models (GLM), artificial neural networks (ANN), random forests (RF) and maximum entropy (ME). From the results we generated predictive maps that were used to identify areas of high probability occurrence. We made field visits to the top-ranked sites to search for new populations of the target species. Results Random forests gave the best results according to area under the curve and Kappa statistics, although ME was in close agreement. While GLM and ANN also gave good results, they were less restrictive and more varied than RF and ME. Cross-model correlations were the highest for species with the most records and declined with record numbers. Model assessment using a separate dataset confirmed that RF provided the best predictions of appropriate habitat. Use of RF output to prioritize search areas resulted in the discovery of 16 new populations of the target species. Main conclusions Species distribution models, such as RF and ME, which use presence data and information about the background matrix where species do not occur, may be an effective tool for new population discovery of rare plant species, but there does appear to be a lower threshold in the number of occurrences required to build a good model.
引用
收藏
页码:565 / 576
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
ALEXANDER E, 2002, TRINITY SERPENTINE S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, STRUCTURE DYNAMICS G
[3]   Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: Role of artificial data and theory [J].
Austin, M. P. ;
Belbin, L. ;
Meyers, J. A. ;
Doherty, M. D. ;
Luoto, M. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 199 (02) :197-216
[4]   Species distribution models and ecological theory: A critical assessment and some possible new approaches [J].
Austin, Mike .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 200 (1-2) :1-19
[5]   Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling [J].
Austin, MP .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2002, 157 (2-3) :101-118
[6]   Effects of land-cover transformation and climate change on the distribution of two microendemic lizards, genus Uma, of Northern Mexico [J].
Ballesteros-Barrera, Claudia ;
Martinez-Meyer, Enrique ;
Gadsden, Hector .
JOURNAL OF HERPETOLOGY, 2007, 41 (04) :733-740
[7]  
BEERS TW, 1966, J FOREST, V64, P691
[8]   Effects of climate change on the distribution of Iberian tree species [J].
Benito Garzon, Marta ;
Sanchez de Dios, Rut ;
Sainz Ollero, Helios .
APPLIED VEGETATION SCIENCE, 2008, 11 (02) :169-178
[9]   Putting a cart before the search: Successful habitat prediction for a rare forest herb [J].
Bourg, NA ;
McShea, WJ ;
Gill, DE .
ECOLOGY, 2005, 86 (10) :2793-2804
[10]   Random forests [J].
Breiman, L .
MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) :5-32