Does language matter for implicit theory of mind? The effects of epistemic verb training on implicit and explicit false-belief understanding

被引:20
作者
Juan, Valerie San [1 ,2 ]
Astington, Janet Wilde [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Ontario Inst Studies Educ, Dept Appl Psychol & Human Dev, 252 Bloor St West, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Calgary, Dept Psychol, 2500 Univ Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Theory of mind; Anticipatory eye gaze; Epistemic verb training; CHILDRENS; INFANTS; METAANALYSIS; ATTRIBUTION; CHINESE; ABILITY; HUMANS;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.12.003
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
We examined the effects of epistemic verb training on preschoolers' implicit and explicit inferences about epistemic states. Eighty-four children (mean age 3;5), who initially failed explicit measures of false-belief understanding, were trained with visual scenes of true- and false-belief. Across three training groups, linguistic input was manipulated so that children heard narrations that contained either: (a) the description of an agent's actions without an epistemic verb, (b) a familiar epistemic verb (thinks), or (c) the familiar epistemic verb in contexts of true-belief and a novel epistemic verb (gorps) in contexts of false-belief. Significant post-training improvements were exclusively observed on implicit measures of false-belief and only for children who received training with epistemic verbs. Findings indicate that linguistic training facilitates the implicit processing of epistemic states but these effects may be limited to specific contexts of false-belief reasoning. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 32
页数:14
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Do Humans Have Two Systems to Track Beliefs and Belief-Like States? [J].
Apperly, Ian A. ;
Butterfill, Stephen A. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2009, 116 (04) :953-970
[2]  
Astington J.W., 2006, The roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition, and human interaction, P179
[3]  
Astington J.W., 2005, WHY LANGUAGE MATTERS, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195159912.001.0001, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159912.003.0001]
[4]   A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development [J].
Astington, JW ;
Jenkins, JM .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 35 (05) :1311-1320
[5]   False-belief understanding in infants [J].
Baillargeon, Rene ;
Scott, Rose M. ;
He, Zijing .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2010, 14 (03) :110-118
[6]   Individual Differences in Executive Functioning Predict Preschoolers' Improvement From Theory-of-Mind Training [J].
Benson, Jeannette E. ;
Sabbagh, Mark A. ;
Carlson, Stephanie M. ;
Zelazo, Philip David .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 49 (09) :1615-1627
[7]   How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind [J].
Butterfill, Stephen A. ;
Apperly, Ian A. .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 2013, 28 (05) :606-637
[8]   IMPLICIT UNDERSTANDING OF BELIEF [J].
CLEMENTS, WA ;
PERNER, J .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 9 (04) :377-395
[9]   Complements to cognition: a longitudinal study of the relationship between complex syntax and false-belief-understanding [J].
de Villiers, JG ;
Pyers, JE .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 17 (01) :1037-1060
[10]  
de Villiers JG, 2003, BRADFORD BOOKS, P335