共 318 条
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
被引:245
作者:
Zimmermann, Johannes
[1
]
Kerber, Andre
[2
]
Rek, Katharina
[3
]
Hopwood, Christopher J.
[4
]
Krueger, Robert F.
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, Holland Str 36-38, D-34127 Kassel, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Max Planck Inst Psychiat, Munich, Germany
[4] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词:
Personality disorders;
DSM-5;
ICD-11;
Dimensional models;
Reliability;
Validity;
PUTATIVE RESEARCH ALGORITHM;
DIMENSIONAL TRAIT MODEL;
PATHOLOGICAL PERSONALITY;
SECTION II;
PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES;
CONSTRUCT-VALIDITY;
MALADAPTIVE TRAITS;
CLINICAL UTILITY;
HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE;
ICD-11;
CLASSIFICATION;
D O I:
10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z
中图分类号:
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号:
100205 ;
摘要:
Purpose of Review Both the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the chapter on personality disorders (PD) in the recent version of ICD-11 embody a shift from a categorical to a dimensional paradigm for the classification of PD. We describe these new models, summarize available measures, and provide a comprehensive review of research on the AMPD. Recent Findings A total of 237 publications on severity (criterion A) and maladaptive traits (criterion B) of the AMPD indicate (a) acceptable interrater reliability, (b) largely consistent latent structures, (c) substantial convergence with a range of theoretically and clinically relevant external measures, and (d) some evidence for incremental validity when controlling for categorical PD diagnoses. However, measures of criterion A and B are highly correlated, which poses conceptual challenges. The AMPD has stimulated extensive research with promising findings. We highlight open questions and provide recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文