The Couple Flourishing MeasurePalabras clave(sic)(sic)(sic)

被引:10
作者
Sanri, Cagla [1 ]
Halford, William Kim [1 ]
Rogge, Ronald D. [2 ]
von Hippel, William [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Sch Psychol, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[2] Univ Rochester, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Relationship Quality; Item Response Theory; Relationship Satisfaction; Couples; Flourishing; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; RELATIONSHIP EDUCATION; QUALITY; SATISFACTION; SCALE; PARTICIPANTS; ADJUSTMENT; MARRIAGE; VALIDITY; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1111/famp.12632
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Couple satisfaction has been extensively investigated, but little attention has been paid to the nature and assessment of high-quality, flourishing couple relationships. Particularly, current measures of relationship quality are insensitive at the upper end of the continuum, which in turn hinders progress toward understanding and facilitating flourishing couple relationships. Drawing on concepts developed in positive psychology, we proposed a theoretical framework of couple flourishing that incorporates hedonic and eudemonic components. Items to assess these aspects of couple flourishing were generated and administered online to a sample of 1,116 participants. Using combined methods of classical test theory and item response theory (IRT), we selected the most informative items to form 4-, 8-, 16-item versions of a Couple Flourishing Measure (CFM). IRT analyses show that the CFM discriminated variation at the upper range of relationship quality better than widely used measures of relationship satisfaction. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that couple flourishing was related to, but distinguishable from, relationship satisfaction. In an independent sample of 330 participants, we replicated the unifactorial structure of the CFM, and the distinguishability of couple flourishing from couple satisfaction. This research offers new insight into the concept of relationship flourishing. The sensitivity of the CFM at the high end of relationship quality makes it possible to test for predictors of relationship flourishing and evaluate interventions that seek to enhance flourishing.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 476
页数:20
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Agnew C.R., 2014, Social influences on romantic relationships, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139333610
[2]   A longitudinal study of marital problems and subsequent divorce [J].
Amato, PR ;
Rogers, SJ .
JOURNAL OF MARRIAGE AND THE FAMILY, 1997, 59 (03) :612-624
[3]   Couples' shared participation in novel and arousing activities and experienced relationship quality [J].
Aron, A ;
Norman, CC ;
Aron, EN ;
McKenna, C .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 78 (02) :273-284
[4]   Assessment of Couple Relationships Standards in Same-Sex Attracted Adults [J].
Baker, Nicholas A. ;
Halford, W. Kim .
FAMILY PROCESS, 2020, 59 (02) :537-555
[5]  
Beach S.R. H., 2012, Family problems and family violence: Reliable assessment and the ICD-11, P91
[6]   Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk [J].
Berinsky, Adam J. ;
Huber, Gregory A. ;
Lenz, Gabriel S. .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2012, 20 (03) :351-368
[7]   A validation of the subjective vitality scale using structural equation modeling [J].
Bostic, TJ ;
Rubio, DM ;
Hood, M .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2000, 52 (03) :313-324
[8]  
Burgess E.W., 1939, PREDICTING SUCCESS F
[9]   Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing [J].
Casler, Krista ;
Bickel, Lydia ;
Hackett, Elizabeth .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2013, 29 (06) :2156-2160
[10]   Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development [J].
Clark, LA ;
Watson, D .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1995, 7 (03) :309-319