Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing and Polymerase Chain Reaction for Personalized Treatment-Related Genomic Status in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

被引:6
|
作者
Su, Wei-Chih [1 ,2 ]
Tsai, Yi-Chen [1 ]
Tsai, Hsiang-Lin [1 ,3 ]
Chang, Tsung-Kun [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Tzu-Chieh [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Huang, Ching-Wen [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Yen-Cheng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Ching-Chun [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Po-Jung [1 ]
Liu, Yun-Ru [6 ]
Hsieh, Tsung-Han [6 ]
Wang, Jaw-Yuan [1 ,2 ,3 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Colorectal Surg, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[2] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Clin Med, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Fac Med, Dept Surg, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Municipal Tatung Hosp, Dept Surg, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Dept Surg, Div Gen & Digest Surg, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[6] Taipei Med Univ, Off Human Res, Joint Biobank, Taipei 10675, Taiwan
[7] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Coll Med, Grad Inst Med, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[8] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Ctr Canc Res, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[9] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Cohort Res Ctr, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan
[10] Minist Hlth & Welf, Pingtung Hosp, Pingtung 90054, Taiwan
[11] Taipei Med Univ, Sch Pharm, Clin Pharmacogen & Pharmacoprote, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
关键词
next-generation sequencing; polymerase chain reaction; metastatic colorectal cancer; RAS MUTATIONS; K-RAS; KRAS; BRAF; CETUXIMAB; PANITUMUMAB; FLUOROURACIL; LEUCOVORIN; PATHWAYS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.3390/cimb44040106
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Personalized treatments based on the genetic profiles of tumors can simultaneously optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity, which is beneficial for improving patient outcomes. This study aimed to integrate gene alterations associated with predictive and prognostic outcomes in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and in-house next-generation sequencing (NGS) to detect KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations. In the present study, 41 patients with mCRC were assessed between August 2017 and June 2019 at a single institution. The overall concordance between NGS and PCR results for detecting KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations was considerably high (87.8-92.7%), with only 15 discrepant results between PCR and NGS. Our companion diagnostic test analyzes KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF as a panel of CRC molecular targets; therefore, it has the advantages of requiring fewer specimens and being more time and cost efficient than conventional testing for separate analyses, allowing for the simultaneous analysis of multiple genes.
引用
收藏
页码:1552 / 1563
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Genetic specificity study using next-generation sequencing (NGS) of peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer compared to primary colorectal cancer
    Lee, Sungchul
    Shin, Wonseok
    Park, Dong-Guk
    Namgung, Hwan
    GENES & GENOMICS, 2024, 46 (03) : 289 - 302
  • [22] Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing with conventional urine culture for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis
    Zhao, Meng
    Qi, Shuang
    Sun, Yinuo
    Zheng, Xue
    OPEN MEDICINE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [23] Genetic specificity study using next-generation sequencing (NGS) of peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer compared to primary colorectal cancer
    Sungchul Lee
    Wonseok Shin
    Dong-Guk Park
    Hwan Namgung
    Genes & Genomics, 2024, 46 : 289 - 302
  • [24] Comparison of KRAS mutation analysis of colorectal cancer samples by standard testing and next-generation sequencing
    Kothari, Nishi
    Schell, Michael J.
    Teer, Jamie K.
    Yeatman, Timothy
    Shibata, David
    Kim, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2014, 67 (09) : 764 - 767
  • [25] Association of Age With Treatment-Related Adverse Events and Survival in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
    Meng, Lingbin
    Thapa, Ram
    Delgado, Maria G.
    Gomez, Maria F.
    Ji, Rui
    Knepper, Todd C.
    Hubbard, Joleen M.
    Wang, Xuefeng
    Permuth, Jennifer B.
    Kim, Richard D.
    Laber, Damian A.
    Xie, Hao
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2023, 6 (06) : E2320035
  • [26] Genomic Alterations in Circulating Tumor DNA from Diverse Cancer Patients Identified by Next-Generation Sequencing
    Schwaederle, Maria
    Chattopadhyay, Ranajoy
    Kato, Shumei
    Fanta, Paul T.
    Banks, Kimberly C.
    Choi, In Sil
    Piccioni, David E.
    Ikeda, Sadakatsu
    Talasaz, AmirAli
    Lanman, Richard B.
    Bazhenova, Lyudmila
    Kurzrock, Razelle
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 77 (19) : 5419 - 5427
  • [27] Postoperative Circulating Tumor DNA Can Predict High Risk Patients with Colorectal Cancer Based on Next-Generation Sequencing
    Lee, Chul Seung
    Kim, Hoon Seok
    Schageman, Jeoffrey
    Lee, In Kyu
    Kim, Myungshin
    Kim, Yonggoo
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (16)
  • [28] Comparison of next generation sequencing, SNaPshot assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction for lung adenocarcinoma EGFR mutation assessment
    Cernomaz, Andrei-Tudor
    Macovei, Ina Iuliana
    Pavel, Ionut
    Grigoriu, Carmen
    Marinca, Mihai
    Baty, Florent
    Peter, Simona
    Zonda, Radu
    Brutsche, Martin
    Grigoriu, Bogdan-Dragos
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2016, 16
  • [29] Transcriptome analysis in primary colorectal cancer tissues from patients with and without liver metastases using next-generation sequencing
    Wang, Sen
    Zhang, Chuan
    Zhang, Zhiyuan
    Qian, Wenwei
    Sun, Ye
    Ji, Bing
    Zhang, Yue
    Zhu, Chunyan
    Ji, Dongjian
    Wang, Qingyuan
    Sun, Yueming
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2017, 6 (08): : 1976 - 1987
  • [30] Next-Generation Sequencing-Directed Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer in Routine Clinical Practice
    Bruzas, Simona
    Kuemmel, Sherko
    Harrach, Hakima
    Breit, Elisabeth
    Ataseven, Beyhan
    Traut, Alexander
    Rueland, Anna
    Kostara, Athina
    Chiari, Ouafaa
    Dittmer-Grabowski, Christine
    Reinisch, Mattea
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (18)