Resource Efficiency and an Integral Framework for Performance Measurement

被引:8
作者
Bergmann, Anne [1 ]
Guenther, Edeltraud [1 ]
Kara, Sami [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Dresden, Fac Business & Econ, Chair Environm Management & Accounting, Dresden, Germany
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sustainable Mfg & Life Cycle Engn Res Grp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
(corporate) resource efficiency; indicator; performance measurement; integral framework; expert interviews; environmental management accounting; resource culture; sustainability accounting; MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; STAKEHOLDERS; CHINA;
D O I
10.1002/sd.1669
中图分类号
F0 [经济学]; F1 [世界各国经济概况、经济史、经济地理]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
0201 ; 020105 ; 03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Scarce natural resources and the associated price increases are two of the many sustainability challenges that corporations face in the 21st century. Although resource efficiency is regarded as one of the means to tackle this issue, corporations are unsure of how to operationalize the term into appropriate indicators and how to measure progress towards being more resource efficient. We therefore interviewed 28 experts with two main outcomes. First, although questions focused on quite technical steps of the evaluation process and specific indicators, experts often steered the conversation from operational details to organizational aspects such as setting a resource culture and communication. Second, although interview results implicate several pathways to assess corporate resource efficiency, the analysis indicates a fit to a common performance measurement framework. Thus, corporations can build on prior work of general performance measurement research when they aim to consider resource efficiency performance as part of their progress towards sustainability. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 165
页数:16
相关论文
共 48 条
[11]   Adopting Proactive Environmental Strategy: The Influence of Stakeholders and Firm Size [J].
Darnall, Nicole ;
Henriques, Irene ;
Sadorsky, Perry .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2010, 47 (06) :1072-1094
[12]   Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges [J].
Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. ;
Graebner, Melissa E. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2007, 50 (01) :25-32
[13]   BUILDING THEORIES FROM CASE-STUDY RESEARCH [J].
EISENHARDT, KM .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 1989, 14 (04) :532-550
[14]   The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis [J].
Ferreira, Aldonio ;
Otley, David .
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2009, 20 (04) :263-282
[15]   The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use [J].
Figge, Frank ;
Hahn, Tobias ;
Barkemeyer, Ralf .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2014, 105 :274-283
[16]   A review of performance measurement: Towards performance management [J].
Folan, P ;
Browne, J .
COMPUTERS IN INDUSTRY, 2005, 56 (07) :663-680
[17]   Contemporary performance measurement systems: A review of their consequences and a framework for research [J].
Franco-Santos, Monica ;
Lucianetti, Lorenzo ;
Bourne, Mike .
MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (02) :79-119
[18]   A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level [J].
Giljum, Stefan ;
Burger, Eva ;
Hinterberger, Friedrich ;
Lutter, Stephan ;
Bruckner, Martin .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2011, 55 (03) :300-308
[19]  
Harrison A., 2003, ESSENTIAL SKILLS MAN, P158
[20]   Exergy as a tool for evaluation of the resource efficiency of recycling systems [J].
Ignatenko, O. ;
v n Schalk, A. ;
Reuter, M. A. .
MINERALS ENGINEERING, 2007, 20 (09) :862-874